Adolescence is a period of intense change that leads to many conflicts and a breakdown in communication between parents and children. This special issue gives some tips for maintaining family ties and maintaining the parent-teen relationship.
Teenagers often blame their parents for saying no without giving any explanation, for not listening and, above all, for not understanding. In brief, they suffer from a lack of communication with them. The parents’ fear of watching their children go away, and their anxiety about seeing them do stupid things such as touching drugs or joining a group of bad friends does not count. Yet, it is often enough to just listen to both sides in order to maintain the exchanges throughout adolescence.
Parent-teen communication
Adolescence is notoriously difficult to live ... for parents. Communication seems broken with this child that no longer recognizes anything. What kind of action should you take when it comes to divorce and children? It is often necessary to review the relations between parents and adolescents. And the buddy-buddy attitude is not always the best for these youngsters who still need an authority figure.
Drugs and youth
Teenagers often adopt rebellious behavior. They come home later and later, they drink beer for the first time, they smoke their first cigarette, and they try drugs. Faced with these potentially dangerous behaviors, parents are often scared and this is really something that makes it a lot more difficult for them since they also have to deal with divorce law and all the other procedures related to their divorce.
Adolescent health
Health is not a matter of great concern to the majority of adolescents who have their youth on their side. However, they are not immune to teenagers’ diseases, such as acne or sexually transmitted infections or blood transmission infections (STIs). Besides depression, which is often overlooked, there is also obesity, diabetes and other ailments associated with poor diet and physical inactivity.
Showing posts with label children and divorce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children and divorce. Show all posts
Divorce and Toasted Children!
The National Institute of Demographic Studies (INED) confirmed in its report published in May 2002 that the separation or divorce of parents is highly prejudicial, particularly in the field of education and that this is way beyond divorce law. The figures are frightening!
Family life is put to the test. The number of divorces and separations has continued to grow over the last few decades. However, these changes do not save the children involved in these marriages. Quite the contrary, the implications are much greater, but many people refuse to believe it. INED demonstrated this using a series of findings and figures. The percentages suggest that we think about the situation.
- First of all, the majority of parental separation situations reduce the
average duration of studies of children aged 6 months to over a year.
- In privileged backgrounds in which the parents are college graduates or
executives, a divorce doubles the failure rate in the Baccalaureate exam
(7% failure against 15% in case of divorce).
- The number of second cycle university graduates decreased from 45% to
25% with the families in which a divorce has occurred.
- One in two children leaves school in case their mothers have no
education as compared to 37% in a united family. Also, the number of
university graduates dropped to three per cent.
- On the employee side, 22% of children have no degree although their mothers have graduated college,
while there are only 11% such children in non-separated families and 30% are graduates, while 35% are
not.
These academic difficulties and all the rest of the situations are due to rupture or parental home environment prior to separation or divorce. One thing is true and that it that not only the adults are involved in a rupture. Divorce and children are highly connected.
Family life is put to the test. The number of divorces and separations has continued to grow over the last few decades. However, these changes do not save the children involved in these marriages. Quite the contrary, the implications are much greater, but many people refuse to believe it. INED demonstrated this using a series of findings and figures. The percentages suggest that we think about the situation.
- First of all, the majority of parental separation situations reduce the
average duration of studies of children aged 6 months to over a year.
- In privileged backgrounds in which the parents are college graduates or
executives, a divorce doubles the failure rate in the Baccalaureate exam
(7% failure against 15% in case of divorce).
- The number of second cycle university graduates decreased from 45% to
25% with the families in which a divorce has occurred.
- One in two children leaves school in case their mothers have no
education as compared to 37% in a united family. Also, the number of
university graduates dropped to three per cent.
- On the employee side, 22% of children have no degree although their mothers have graduated college,
while there are only 11% such children in non-separated families and 30% are graduates, while 35% are
not.
These academic difficulties and all the rest of the situations are due to rupture or parental home environment prior to separation or divorce. One thing is true and that it that not only the adults are involved in a rupture. Divorce and children are highly connected.
Alternating Residence Beside the Mother
We interviewed Viviane, who works with the media, to know her views on alternating residence.
Vivian’s Testimony
I imposed an alternating care for 1 year and a half. I am 34 years old and I have always lived in Paris. I married in 1993, I had my daughter in January 1997. We parted with her father when she was a few months old and our divorce was finalized in 2000.
Our experience with joint custody was imposed by the judge in conciliation. Indeed, each of us asked to be her guardian and the president has preferred not to rule on the residence of P (our daughter) on behalf of one or the other from the start of the procedure. She wanted to further investigate the case and clarify his views in a complex case from the outside.
We rented an apartment and had a nanny at home since the birth of P, the judge decided that P would remain in the apartment full time with the nanny during the day, her father cares during the odd weeks and I, the even weeks.
We had to share the cost of the nanny, the rent, etc...
There was no connection between her father and me as we alternated custody on Monday nights.
This worked for 1 1 / 2 years, up to a judge's decision on our divorce. The separation was difficult for my daughter because she was very young
By being sincere, this solution worked well.
At first, the situation was resolved as clockwork. She quickly picked up the steady and consistent pace with this solution. It is true - she has the chance of having a remarkably constant presence of women (the nanny). Of course, she is not her mother, but her role is crucial. That said, I do not really know how the effects of repeated separations work. What I know is that today the child is very balanced, serene and does not feel abandoned by one or the other.
For me (I will not speak for her father!), the situation was difficult because I was separated from my daughter, but the weeks "without" allowed me to step back, emotionally and humanly "cashing" the throes of divorce "warrior".
This solution has also probably helped much because I think none of us felt the gross injustice of the arbitrary custody decided by a judge who did not yet know the facts.
Nevertheless, this solution was stopped and P came to live with me, but always sees much of her father.
Without the judge's decision, I never would have decided on an alternating custody, assuming that a child should stay with the mother if possible, especially if they are young. That said, seeing the result today after not taking any divorce legal advice, I must admit that it has been quite beneficial for now.
We really watch ourselves about "arguing", we know that we can risk losing our deep application.
Today, we do not continue this system of care because I think that P has grown a lot and her first 7 years must be mostly with me. We also still have some catching up to do in the mother / daughter department.
It is impossible to decide once and for all what a child’s life should be like. We parents must constantly observe, listen, question and try to be as close as possible to the real needs of our children. And who knows if it's hard as this is not like a DIY divorce - you cannot decide everything on your own!
Vivian’s Testimony
I imposed an alternating care for 1 year and a half. I am 34 years old and I have always lived in Paris. I married in 1993, I had my daughter in January 1997. We parted with her father when she was a few months old and our divorce was finalized in 2000.
Our experience with joint custody was imposed by the judge in conciliation. Indeed, each of us asked to be her guardian and the president has preferred not to rule on the residence of P (our daughter) on behalf of one or the other from the start of the procedure. She wanted to further investigate the case and clarify his views in a complex case from the outside.
We rented an apartment and had a nanny at home since the birth of P, the judge decided that P would remain in the apartment full time with the nanny during the day, her father cares during the odd weeks and I, the even weeks.
We had to share the cost of the nanny, the rent, etc...
There was no connection between her father and me as we alternated custody on Monday nights.
This worked for 1 1 / 2 years, up to a judge's decision on our divorce. The separation was difficult for my daughter because she was very young
By being sincere, this solution worked well.
At first, the situation was resolved as clockwork. She quickly picked up the steady and consistent pace with this solution. It is true - she has the chance of having a remarkably constant presence of women (the nanny). Of course, she is not her mother, but her role is crucial. That said, I do not really know how the effects of repeated separations work. What I know is that today the child is very balanced, serene and does not feel abandoned by one or the other.
For me (I will not speak for her father!), the situation was difficult because I was separated from my daughter, but the weeks "without" allowed me to step back, emotionally and humanly "cashing" the throes of divorce "warrior".
This solution has also probably helped much because I think none of us felt the gross injustice of the arbitrary custody decided by a judge who did not yet know the facts.
Nevertheless, this solution was stopped and P came to live with me, but always sees much of her father.
Without the judge's decision, I never would have decided on an alternating custody, assuming that a child should stay with the mother if possible, especially if they are young. That said, seeing the result today after not taking any divorce legal advice, I must admit that it has been quite beneficial for now.
We really watch ourselves about "arguing", we know that we can risk losing our deep application.
Today, we do not continue this system of care because I think that P has grown a lot and her first 7 years must be mostly with me. We also still have some catching up to do in the mother / daughter department.
It is impossible to decide once and for all what a child’s life should be like. We parents must constantly observe, listen, question and try to be as close as possible to the real needs of our children. And who knows if it's hard as this is not like a DIY divorce - you cannot decide everything on your own!
Alternating Residence Beside the Father
We interviewed Felix, 36, a businessman and Philip's father, aged 6, to hear his views on alternating residence.
Testimony of Felix, divorced, 36 years old, Phillip's father. Philip is 6 years old.
You have been practicing alternate residence for five years and it is precisely because the current divorce law is changing. As a precursor, why and how did you choose this type of care?
In 1996, when we divorced, it was not legally possible to have a dual residency for the child.
The judge gave custody to my wife, but she frequently needed to move for professional reasons. Naturally, we turned to this type of solution, without going before the judge for family affairs.
What advice would you give parents who are considering this type of solution?
In my opinion, there must be dialogue between parents, a common vision of education (school choice, religion etc ...), and obviously a geographical proximity. But there is a mistake not to commit: Everyone should stay home - I'm never going to dinner or a drink with my ex. Initially, we tried to celebrate Phillip’s birthday together: he has completely destabilized. When the moment of separation came, he no longer knew whom he was to go with and did not want to leave one of the two. It was very sad and I told him he had to sleep with his mom that night since we alternate Christmas every other year and we celebrate two anniversaries.
Is there a risk for children and one for you?
In my opinion, there is no risk when it comes to divorce and children, but it requires both parents to better deal with it.
What do you think are the advantages of alternating care for you, your ex-wife and your children?
I think that it provides stability for the child and it prevents parents from becoming gift fathers or mothers.
Nothing changes for the fathers who cared for their children before the divorce.
But for others, there is a clear drift to become a gift dad this time of a weekend and males have a great ability to pull away from children.
Each parent can participate in the daily life of the child and can fully engage in a week.
We are best able to manage any disease, for we know that we can breathe the next week.
What do you think are the disadvantages of shared custody, for you and your ex-wife and children?
The first drawback: it is forbidden to move and it all stays in the same area.
Imagine recomposed two couples, while four were married, making a simple calculation that ultimately involves 16 adults, let alone children.
Second drawback: There are two of everything.
How did your child react when he found himself facing two houses?
Well, he separates the two completely.
When Phil arrived home, I always told him how long it will last so he could find out. I counted on his fingers so that he would understand it better and not be too unhappy.
Do you think we should generalize this type of care?
We can generalize this custody method because there is no reason why women should take full responsibility after the divorce.
Testimony of Felix, divorced, 36 years old, Phillip's father. Philip is 6 years old.
You have been practicing alternate residence for five years and it is precisely because the current divorce law is changing. As a precursor, why and how did you choose this type of care?
In 1996, when we divorced, it was not legally possible to have a dual residency for the child.
The judge gave custody to my wife, but she frequently needed to move for professional reasons. Naturally, we turned to this type of solution, without going before the judge for family affairs.
What advice would you give parents who are considering this type of solution?
In my opinion, there must be dialogue between parents, a common vision of education (school choice, religion etc ...), and obviously a geographical proximity. But there is a mistake not to commit: Everyone should stay home - I'm never going to dinner or a drink with my ex. Initially, we tried to celebrate Phillip’s birthday together: he has completely destabilized. When the moment of separation came, he no longer knew whom he was to go with and did not want to leave one of the two. It was very sad and I told him he had to sleep with his mom that night since we alternate Christmas every other year and we celebrate two anniversaries.
Is there a risk for children and one for you?
In my opinion, there is no risk when it comes to divorce and children, but it requires both parents to better deal with it.
What do you think are the advantages of alternating care for you, your ex-wife and your children?
I think that it provides stability for the child and it prevents parents from becoming gift fathers or mothers.
Nothing changes for the fathers who cared for their children before the divorce.
But for others, there is a clear drift to become a gift dad this time of a weekend and males have a great ability to pull away from children.
Each parent can participate in the daily life of the child and can fully engage in a week.
We are best able to manage any disease, for we know that we can breathe the next week.
What do you think are the disadvantages of shared custody, for you and your ex-wife and children?
The first drawback: it is forbidden to move and it all stays in the same area.
Imagine recomposed two couples, while four were married, making a simple calculation that ultimately involves 16 adults, let alone children.
Second drawback: There are two of everything.
How did your child react when he found himself facing two houses?
Well, he separates the two completely.
When Phil arrived home, I always told him how long it will last so he could find out. I counted on his fingers so that he would understand it better and not be too unhappy.
Do you think we should generalize this type of care?
We can generalize this custody method because there is no reason why women should take full responsibility after the divorce.
The Maintenance Allowance
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
at 4:53 AM 0 comments Labels: allowance, child support, children and divorce
The maintenance allowance means everything that is indispensable to sustain us: food, shelter, clothing and medical care. Also, it refers to the education and training the children or adults who have not completed their training receive. The maintenance allowance may also include the costs of pregnancy and childbirth if they are not otherwise covered. It is mandatory for maintenance to be paid by the spouses for the children, therefore, there is no way out when it comes to this matter related to divorce and children.
Meeting the requirements is imposed by the sentence of nullity, separation or divorce and it is delivered after the processing of the relevant procedure and the person who is obliged to pay is set, the amount and the basis for updating (usually will be the Consumer Price Index), the period and form of payment.
The amount of alimony depends on two circumstances:
- The income of the person who is obliged to pay it.
- The needs of the beneficiary.
There are some European countries which have a legal scale for this alimony, but there are also others which do not have one, this alimony being established by the judge, according to personal reasoning and to the margins imposed by divorce law. Subsequently, this amount also may be increased or decreased depending on the judicial needs of the beneficiary and the increase or decrease of the economic resources of the obligor.
The changes in the amount of maintenance allowance are made through appropriate judicial procedures and they are not effective until the final sentence is pronounced. This includes, for example, that the spouse who pays the maintenance for the children, cannot by themselves alter the amount because their income has experienced a reduction: they have to apply for it in court.
The obligation to pay maintenance ceases when:
- The obligation to provide it expires
- Resources that are required are reduced to the point in which the survival of the payer and that of their
new family are endangered
- The person receiving the allowance exercises a profession or trade or their economic situation has
improved so that they do not need the maintenance allowance anymore
- If the one who receives the allowance makes some of the mistakes that lead to disinheritance
- If due to misconduct or lack of application for work, they lose their entitlement to allowance for the
duration of their behavior.
In principle, the maintenance allowance should be paid until the children reach adulthood. However, if after reaching this age, they are still studying or have no means of subsistence, the children may require allowance until they are able to earn their own living.
In these cases, the recovery of maintenance should be performed by the child directly, but they may not do so on behalf of the parent with whom they live together.
For its part, the breach of the duty of support involves the initiation of the procedure for execution on the assets required and also generates criminal liability: the lack of payment for two consecutive months or for four non-consecutive months constitutes a crime of family abandonment and it is to be punished by imprisonment from 3 months to 1 year or a fine between 6 to 24 months.
It is always a good idea to consult a lawyer as the lawyer can give you the proper advice as to whether to initiate any kind of legal action or not.
Meeting the requirements is imposed by the sentence of nullity, separation or divorce and it is delivered after the processing of the relevant procedure and the person who is obliged to pay is set, the amount and the basis for updating (usually will be the Consumer Price Index), the period and form of payment.
The amount of alimony depends on two circumstances:
- The income of the person who is obliged to pay it.
- The needs of the beneficiary.
There are some European countries which have a legal scale for this alimony, but there are also others which do not have one, this alimony being established by the judge, according to personal reasoning and to the margins imposed by divorce law. Subsequently, this amount also may be increased or decreased depending on the judicial needs of the beneficiary and the increase or decrease of the economic resources of the obligor.
The changes in the amount of maintenance allowance are made through appropriate judicial procedures and they are not effective until the final sentence is pronounced. This includes, for example, that the spouse who pays the maintenance for the children, cannot by themselves alter the amount because their income has experienced a reduction: they have to apply for it in court.
The obligation to pay maintenance ceases when:
- The obligation to provide it expires
- Resources that are required are reduced to the point in which the survival of the payer and that of their
new family are endangered
- The person receiving the allowance exercises a profession or trade or their economic situation has
improved so that they do not need the maintenance allowance anymore
- If the one who receives the allowance makes some of the mistakes that lead to disinheritance
- If due to misconduct or lack of application for work, they lose their entitlement to allowance for the
duration of their behavior.
In principle, the maintenance allowance should be paid until the children reach adulthood. However, if after reaching this age, they are still studying or have no means of subsistence, the children may require allowance until they are able to earn their own living.
In these cases, the recovery of maintenance should be performed by the child directly, but they may not do so on behalf of the parent with whom they live together.
For its part, the breach of the duty of support involves the initiation of the procedure for execution on the assets required and also generates criminal liability: the lack of payment for two consecutive months or for four non-consecutive months constitutes a crime of family abandonment and it is to be punished by imprisonment from 3 months to 1 year or a fine between 6 to 24 months.
It is always a good idea to consult a lawyer as the lawyer can give you the proper advice as to whether to initiate any kind of legal action or not.
The Alimony
The court sets spousal support to repair the economic imbalance that the marital breakdown can cause with one of the spouses. The pension is set up to compensate, for example, the dedication of one spouse to homecare and to their family for the entire duration of the marriage or partnership. The amount of the pension is fixed by the judge on the basis of the income and property of the person to satisfy.
In some European countries, there is not any tariff that the judge must comply with when determining spousal maintenance. Therefore, the judge can set a specific amount according to his or her sole discretion, within the range of the law. Also, there is no time limit, but its duration will depend on the duration of cohabitation and the recipient's ability to obtain their own financial resources to place them at a standard of living similar to that enjoyed during marriage. Thus, the recipient's work does not lead, in principle and automatically, to their extinction.
The alimony is sought in the divorce procedure when the perception of the spouses is not compatible with the maintenance payments. Therefore, the procedures for provisional measures shall be fixed for the disadvantaged spouse, the alimony being replaced by the alimony in the decree of separation and after the processing of the due lawsuit.
You can obtain the alimony established in the decree of separation in the procedures for divorce, but if it is not recognized in the separation procedure, it does not remain valid after the divorce.
The amount stated in the decree of separation is updated every year according to the change in the Consumer Price Index published by the National Institute of Statistics. The amount of the pension can be modified in court in cases where the beneficiary can improve or worsen their economic situation. These same circumstances may also lead to termination of alimony.
For its part, the liquidation of community property after separation or the divorce proceedings lead to the extinction of the board unless it concurs with a change in the economic circumstances of the obligor or the assets seized after settlement produce a return to overcome the imbalance that led to its establishment.
The non-payment of alimony, like that of child support, can result in the commission of a crime of family abandonment, which is punishable by imprisonment from 3 months to a year or a fine for 6 to 24 months.
It is always advisable to obtain the advice of a lawyer who, in view of the peculiarities of each case, will inform you whether to initiate the appropriate legal action for the pensions divorce or not.
In some European countries, there is not any tariff that the judge must comply with when determining spousal maintenance. Therefore, the judge can set a specific amount according to his or her sole discretion, within the range of the law. Also, there is no time limit, but its duration will depend on the duration of cohabitation and the recipient's ability to obtain their own financial resources to place them at a standard of living similar to that enjoyed during marriage. Thus, the recipient's work does not lead, in principle and automatically, to their extinction.
The alimony is sought in the divorce procedure when the perception of the spouses is not compatible with the maintenance payments. Therefore, the procedures for provisional measures shall be fixed for the disadvantaged spouse, the alimony being replaced by the alimony in the decree of separation and after the processing of the due lawsuit.
You can obtain the alimony established in the decree of separation in the procedures for divorce, but if it is not recognized in the separation procedure, it does not remain valid after the divorce.
The amount stated in the decree of separation is updated every year according to the change in the Consumer Price Index published by the National Institute of Statistics. The amount of the pension can be modified in court in cases where the beneficiary can improve or worsen their economic situation. These same circumstances may also lead to termination of alimony.
For its part, the liquidation of community property after separation or the divorce proceedings lead to the extinction of the board unless it concurs with a change in the economic circumstances of the obligor or the assets seized after settlement produce a return to overcome the imbalance that led to its establishment.
The non-payment of alimony, like that of child support, can result in the commission of a crime of family abandonment, which is punishable by imprisonment from 3 months to a year or a fine for 6 to 24 months.
It is always advisable to obtain the advice of a lawyer who, in view of the peculiarities of each case, will inform you whether to initiate the appropriate legal action for the pensions divorce or not.
My Parents Split Up - How Is It Possible?
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
at 12:31 AM 0 comments Labels: children and divorce, divorce, divorced parents
How divorce affects adult children
Who said that a divorce only affects kids?
The average person seems to think that parental divorce does not affect an adult or that it does not change their life, but in reality, this type of separation greatly affects adults, too.
It affects people’s minds, not necessarily their daily routines. Adults do not generally blame themselves for the divorce like kids do, yet they often wonder whether they could have done something to prevent it and this kind of separation can be as traumatic as a death for many adult children.
It actually is like death from a certain point of view. It is a family death. Adult children go through the same stages of grief, anger, denial and so on, just like if they were minors. The situation often leads to these children meddling, hoping to be a mediator or something like that or taking sides with either of them.
Separation is the same as loss
Adult children lose many things when their parents divorce. Many lose their sense of childhood. Parents often say that they prefer to separate when the children grow. This makes these children wonder if all the happiness experienced in childhood was a lie.
Adult children also lose their sense of home and security. The security offered let them know that whatever happens in their lives, they can always go home. This security can be very important for children around 20 years old that have recently started their own life.
However, home was mom and dad and a loving family, but this family has been destroyed. These children feel that they no longer belong to a home, they have to redefine what a home means to them and in a very drastic way. They also lose the traditions they had enjoyed all their lives. They lose simple pleasures like dinner with Mom and Dad. They lose their life, although the changes are not very significant.
Many adult children trust their relationships with the opposite sex. They think that if their dad had an affair all these years, they can no longer trust a man and that if their parents’ marriage was so bad, they can never trust marriage again.
These situations are difficult to treat and can cause problems for these children in the future or lead to distrust of marriage or avoiding any relationship. Adult children of divorced parents may also lose their models or heroes. The people they admired, their parents, can become very fallible, especially if they are involved in the divorce or if they are to be blamed for it.
My parents, these people...
A further complication faced by adult children is that they can see the whole truth, being adults. Their parents become real people with real problems. One of the biggest reasons why they may be affected by the divorce has to do with the fact that they now understand many more things. However, kids also understand a lot more of what their parents think.
Infidelity is the most important behavior that shocks with adult children. Adult children are aware that it exists, but their parents never thought they could do it. After all, it is the parents themselves who promote the idea that these things are wrong. A father who respects this idea cannot do it. This frequently makes adult children angry and depressed. However, marital infidelity is just one part of the divorce and it is one of the many factors there are.
Then, adult children can feel other sensations, too:
Many of us were taught to believe that marriage lasts forever, but when our parents decide to get separated, we get a little bit confused. Somehow it's just like with marital infidelity. Our parents do not do what they taught us to do.
Selfishness: adult children feel that their parents are selfish when they divorce. Things get pretty confusing: when a parent decides to go on trial with the other parent for material goods; if a parent refuses to talk to the child if they are related to another; or when they do not give rise to the child because they believe they are not theirs. The "problem" in these situations is when the adult children see their parents as selfish.
On the other hand, when the parent refuses to overcome the divorce, continuing to demand for help and compassion, they can also be seen as selfish. There are many more minor behaviors such as a parent refusing to give the other family photos, for example, also creating this feeling in the child. Seeing this selfishness in a parent may enrage the adult children.
Divorce makes adult children see their parents as private individuals rather than a pair. How can they be just humans instead of parents?
Children discover aspects of their parents’ personality that they have never seen in their lives and new attitudes can be observed, attitudes they never imagined that their parents could have. If this upsets the child, it might cost them the relationship they had before the divorce.
Who said that a divorce only affects kids?
The average person seems to think that parental divorce does not affect an adult or that it does not change their life, but in reality, this type of separation greatly affects adults, too.
It affects people’s minds, not necessarily their daily routines. Adults do not generally blame themselves for the divorce like kids do, yet they often wonder whether they could have done something to prevent it and this kind of separation can be as traumatic as a death for many adult children.
It actually is like death from a certain point of view. It is a family death. Adult children go through the same stages of grief, anger, denial and so on, just like if they were minors. The situation often leads to these children meddling, hoping to be a mediator or something like that or taking sides with either of them.
Separation is the same as loss
Adult children lose many things when their parents divorce. Many lose their sense of childhood. Parents often say that they prefer to separate when the children grow. This makes these children wonder if all the happiness experienced in childhood was a lie.
Adult children also lose their sense of home and security. The security offered let them know that whatever happens in their lives, they can always go home. This security can be very important for children around 20 years old that have recently started their own life.
However, home was mom and dad and a loving family, but this family has been destroyed. These children feel that they no longer belong to a home, they have to redefine what a home means to them and in a very drastic way. They also lose the traditions they had enjoyed all their lives. They lose simple pleasures like dinner with Mom and Dad. They lose their life, although the changes are not very significant.
Many adult children trust their relationships with the opposite sex. They think that if their dad had an affair all these years, they can no longer trust a man and that if their parents’ marriage was so bad, they can never trust marriage again.
These situations are difficult to treat and can cause problems for these children in the future or lead to distrust of marriage or avoiding any relationship. Adult children of divorced parents may also lose their models or heroes. The people they admired, their parents, can become very fallible, especially if they are involved in the divorce or if they are to be blamed for it.
My parents, these people...
A further complication faced by adult children is that they can see the whole truth, being adults. Their parents become real people with real problems. One of the biggest reasons why they may be affected by the divorce has to do with the fact that they now understand many more things. However, kids also understand a lot more of what their parents think.
Infidelity is the most important behavior that shocks with adult children. Adult children are aware that it exists, but their parents never thought they could do it. After all, it is the parents themselves who promote the idea that these things are wrong. A father who respects this idea cannot do it. This frequently makes adult children angry and depressed. However, marital infidelity is just one part of the divorce and it is one of the many factors there are.
Then, adult children can feel other sensations, too:
Many of us were taught to believe that marriage lasts forever, but when our parents decide to get separated, we get a little bit confused. Somehow it's just like with marital infidelity. Our parents do not do what they taught us to do.
Selfishness: adult children feel that their parents are selfish when they divorce. Things get pretty confusing: when a parent decides to go on trial with the other parent for material goods; if a parent refuses to talk to the child if they are related to another; or when they do not give rise to the child because they believe they are not theirs. The "problem" in these situations is when the adult children see their parents as selfish.
On the other hand, when the parent refuses to overcome the divorce, continuing to demand for help and compassion, they can also be seen as selfish. There are many more minor behaviors such as a parent refusing to give the other family photos, for example, also creating this feeling in the child. Seeing this selfishness in a parent may enrage the adult children.
Divorce makes adult children see their parents as private individuals rather than a pair. How can they be just humans instead of parents?
Children discover aspects of their parents’ personality that they have never seen in their lives and new attitudes can be observed, attitudes they never imagined that their parents could have. If this upsets the child, it might cost them the relationship they had before the divorce.
Parents on Weekends
When the parents get separated, it is common for the children to stay and live with their mom. The father then becomes a regulated visit and while the society murmurs, the parents have to do something. The children suffer in silence, their uncle is afraid of being their uncle and there is a gap in the bond between the family members.
Divorced parents, bad guys
In the popular imagination and when gossiping at tea time, the divorced parents are usually the bad guys. They are those who went to buy cigarettes and never return, those who flee in a certain situation, those who do not pay the alimony and those who must be pursued by the law.
Another chapter refers to the other kind of parents, the separated parents, those who leave everything to their partner and still keep their children. These parents imagine, conceive and cradle their young; make them breakfast every day; share the first day of class; and the bedtime story with them. When the marriage is suddenly dissolved, they get to visit the home they built and they soon get to have another male figure as a surrogate parent: the mother's new partner.
The dad feels he helped build a nest and then had to leave forever and nobody cares about his feelings. It is said that men do not cry and perhaps they do because some are so sad that they would form a tsunami if they cried all together. If you do not believe this, take the following aspects into consideration.
Long ago or in the past generations, the children were of the women, who stayed at home and breed them, while the father worked all day and then went to play pool or to the bar with his friends. He gets along very well with his children when they meet.
In the 60s and 70s, people began to learn that if the wife was pregnant, it was like they were both pregnant and he was co-star in this whole process and also after birth, for life. Thus, some men had to bite the bullet and participate to the birth and they were encouraged to cut the umbilical cord and give their babies their first bath. They learned to change diapers, prepare bottles and food and give comfort to the infant at night, if they mourned every three hours. They dared to whisper lullabies to their baby or they would wake them up with that other Pinto song, saying that the rooster fell asleep and did not sing that morning.
In short, they realized that work was a pleasure that had been lost for generations and that the concept of masculinity had a significant page turned and it was time to change for the better.
Of course, the femininity was also changing at the same time. Thus, this new human male was in love with his children and his fatherly role, which was what family was all about and which perhaps healed the wounds from childhood. Then, they experienced a dramatic second lesson: divorcing their partner no longer consists of just breaking the link with a woman, but it exposes them to a much greater pain.
Parents forever?
No film shows the reality better (perhaps no other) than Mrs. Doubtfire (Father Of All Time), this being the drama and feeling of a man having to leave the family home because his wife no longer loved him. He can no longer live with his children he adores.
In the famous film, Robin Williams plays the beleaguered father not to accept the inability to watch his children constantly and since the character is an actor, he ends up posing as a lady of a higher age, Mrs. Doubtfire, who becomes the nanny of his own children.
The same happens in everyday life beyond the details and nuances surrounding the breakage of a marriage. It is very common that the children remain under the custody of the mother, law and culture automatically considering her more popular than the male parent in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
“A parent knows, even before separating, that they need to be times in the life of their children, although they can no longer witness their growth or share activities with them. Then, they eventually notice their physical changes in voice, every week or fortnight or when they can reconnect with them. Their successes and failures will be an anecdote and one feels that they slowly turn into a kind of uncle if they just come and visit and they end up being afraid of the child not missing them anymore,” says Santiago, 53 years old, a teacher in Buenos Aires, who has been separated for ten years and with two children.
The current notes on these issues are usually devoted to describing the delicate situation in which the boys are, who must adapt to a new reality or focus on women's civil rights if their partner does not provides the food required by law.
But this is a more unique story.
Children of divorced parents
“There is no doubt that the link is broken, no matter how good the weekly meeting is since the link is not established everyday”, ensures SÁnchez AndresÉs, a clinical psychologist for 33 years, professor and creator of the Career Counseling ( Psychological Consultant) in the country. He adds:
“In our society, people believe it is the woman or the child who suffers more and forget that the man loses his home, continuity, making them feel sad. My experience as a therapist has put me in front of many men who cry, who are distressed at having to see their children once a week, in a sort of guided tour if he has a proper place to host them and must then return to the mother’s home.”
Moreover, there are men who delay the separation or do not get separated, but live together in appalling conditions in the couple. They stay for 7 or 8 years without any kind of sexual bond with their wife and they sustain a relationship in terms of not losing the interaction with their children.
For her part, Maria Ruth, systemic Gestalt psychologist with 20 years of hospital experience, seems to agree with her colleague and says: “I see them suffer in the office, leave their furniture, home, smells, plants and go away because all that is history and it produces grief. But what do they do when it comes to their sustainable life”.
When the father or uncle feels the distance
Eduardo, accountant of Villa Crespo, 3 children, bank employee: “We had some relationship problems, which were not very serious in my opinion. One night, my wife told me I had to go, she threw me out,” he said when he spoke to his attorney.
“To avoid greater problems, I spend the night at my parents’ house and I went home the next day. When trying to enter, I realized that she had changed the lock, so I attended, she responded insulting me and refused to allow me to be with my children”.
Eduardo is part of another reality, as there are thousands of parents who cannot even see their children regularly. Jose Maria Bouza, founder of Apadeshi in 1988 (PTA away from his children) says: “Separating without the possibility of having contact with the children is a more serious case, because there is an obstruction on the link produced by the partner and the father is marginalized in society, looking for casual work, leaving aside everything and focusing on a court action, because he thinks things will be resolved quickly and this is not so in our country. This is all like a mirage in the mountains: the climber believes to see the top right there, close and later finds out that it is further or that they can never reach it.”
Dad is not an idol for the judges
Jose Maria Bouza, who confesses he only paid about 15,000, thinks that: “a court which raises a question of ownership should assess who is the fittest, not who has the proper gender. They should judge by their psychological conditions, the career development and the time available and especially by their attitude towards their partner about this issue. But the mother is culturally preferred, even ignoring the fact that some mothers have had suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalizations or even that they do not even want to really take care of the kids.”
For her part, Luis Maria Assaneo, founder of Apradim (group of professionals who lecture on topics such as Enigmas of Manliness, Couples in Crisis, etc.), psychologist and professor at the Centre Two of psychological support and member of the Freudian School in Buenos Aires, agrees with Bouza and says: “laws that automatically give custody of children to mothers are obsolete, the father’s possibility to parent has evolved and it used to be the woman who stayed at home, while now both of them work outside the home.”
Ms. Maria Ruth extends the concept: “the mother has a bow gun in the first four years of life that she must not cut, but then both are capable of exerting the role of mother-father or father-mother and the kids could choose to be with one of them.”
Is there hope, father?
Sanchez says: “There are new psychological trends and it does not matter who does what, when and so on, as long as they can take care of the children. There is no such thing as why, who, when and where anymore, the most frequent question being how. These streams provide the ability to think in a concrete way and the family, the ex, the kids, the family reunions do not make the thing so individualistic.”
Maria advises: “ The tendency to be achieved should be that the family recurs to a break, regains homeostasis, finds a new equilibrium, but all tend to do that and everything is in order after a time of crisis. The Dad has to go, he expect a large internal piece of work to overcome this cut or break and it may be time for a re-learning, as there are parents who discover their parentage skills just when they leave.”
Jose Maria Bouzas suggests that the dads that have no children need to change and prepare the nest, becoming better for when they stick the leap and join the other in this adventure.”
Divorced parents, bad guys
In the popular imagination and when gossiping at tea time, the divorced parents are usually the bad guys. They are those who went to buy cigarettes and never return, those who flee in a certain situation, those who do not pay the alimony and those who must be pursued by the law.
Another chapter refers to the other kind of parents, the separated parents, those who leave everything to their partner and still keep their children. These parents imagine, conceive and cradle their young; make them breakfast every day; share the first day of class; and the bedtime story with them. When the marriage is suddenly dissolved, they get to visit the home they built and they soon get to have another male figure as a surrogate parent: the mother's new partner.
The dad feels he helped build a nest and then had to leave forever and nobody cares about his feelings. It is said that men do not cry and perhaps they do because some are so sad that they would form a tsunami if they cried all together. If you do not believe this, take the following aspects into consideration.
Long ago or in the past generations, the children were of the women, who stayed at home and breed them, while the father worked all day and then went to play pool or to the bar with his friends. He gets along very well with his children when they meet.
In the 60s and 70s, people began to learn that if the wife was pregnant, it was like they were both pregnant and he was co-star in this whole process and also after birth, for life. Thus, some men had to bite the bullet and participate to the birth and they were encouraged to cut the umbilical cord and give their babies their first bath. They learned to change diapers, prepare bottles and food and give comfort to the infant at night, if they mourned every three hours. They dared to whisper lullabies to their baby or they would wake them up with that other Pinto song, saying that the rooster fell asleep and did not sing that morning.
In short, they realized that work was a pleasure that had been lost for generations and that the concept of masculinity had a significant page turned and it was time to change for the better.
Of course, the femininity was also changing at the same time. Thus, this new human male was in love with his children and his fatherly role, which was what family was all about and which perhaps healed the wounds from childhood. Then, they experienced a dramatic second lesson: divorcing their partner no longer consists of just breaking the link with a woman, but it exposes them to a much greater pain.
Parents forever?
No film shows the reality better (perhaps no other) than Mrs. Doubtfire (Father Of All Time), this being the drama and feeling of a man having to leave the family home because his wife no longer loved him. He can no longer live with his children he adores.
In the famous film, Robin Williams plays the beleaguered father not to accept the inability to watch his children constantly and since the character is an actor, he ends up posing as a lady of a higher age, Mrs. Doubtfire, who becomes the nanny of his own children.
The same happens in everyday life beyond the details and nuances surrounding the breakage of a marriage. It is very common that the children remain under the custody of the mother, law and culture automatically considering her more popular than the male parent in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
“A parent knows, even before separating, that they need to be times in the life of their children, although they can no longer witness their growth or share activities with them. Then, they eventually notice their physical changes in voice, every week or fortnight or when they can reconnect with them. Their successes and failures will be an anecdote and one feels that they slowly turn into a kind of uncle if they just come and visit and they end up being afraid of the child not missing them anymore,” says Santiago, 53 years old, a teacher in Buenos Aires, who has been separated for ten years and with two children.
The current notes on these issues are usually devoted to describing the delicate situation in which the boys are, who must adapt to a new reality or focus on women's civil rights if their partner does not provides the food required by law.
But this is a more unique story.
Children of divorced parents
“There is no doubt that the link is broken, no matter how good the weekly meeting is since the link is not established everyday”, ensures SÁnchez AndresÉs, a clinical psychologist for 33 years, professor and creator of the Career Counseling ( Psychological Consultant) in the country. He adds:
“In our society, people believe it is the woman or the child who suffers more and forget that the man loses his home, continuity, making them feel sad. My experience as a therapist has put me in front of many men who cry, who are distressed at having to see their children once a week, in a sort of guided tour if he has a proper place to host them and must then return to the mother’s home.”
Moreover, there are men who delay the separation or do not get separated, but live together in appalling conditions in the couple. They stay for 7 or 8 years without any kind of sexual bond with their wife and they sustain a relationship in terms of not losing the interaction with their children.
For her part, Maria Ruth, systemic Gestalt psychologist with 20 years of hospital experience, seems to agree with her colleague and says: “I see them suffer in the office, leave their furniture, home, smells, plants and go away because all that is history and it produces grief. But what do they do when it comes to their sustainable life”.
When the father or uncle feels the distance
Eduardo, accountant of Villa Crespo, 3 children, bank employee: “We had some relationship problems, which were not very serious in my opinion. One night, my wife told me I had to go, she threw me out,” he said when he spoke to his attorney.
“To avoid greater problems, I spend the night at my parents’ house and I went home the next day. When trying to enter, I realized that she had changed the lock, so I attended, she responded insulting me and refused to allow me to be with my children”.
Eduardo is part of another reality, as there are thousands of parents who cannot even see their children regularly. Jose Maria Bouza, founder of Apadeshi in 1988 (PTA away from his children) says: “Separating without the possibility of having contact with the children is a more serious case, because there is an obstruction on the link produced by the partner and the father is marginalized in society, looking for casual work, leaving aside everything and focusing on a court action, because he thinks things will be resolved quickly and this is not so in our country. This is all like a mirage in the mountains: the climber believes to see the top right there, close and later finds out that it is further or that they can never reach it.”
Dad is not an idol for the judges
Jose Maria Bouza, who confesses he only paid about 15,000, thinks that: “a court which raises a question of ownership should assess who is the fittest, not who has the proper gender. They should judge by their psychological conditions, the career development and the time available and especially by their attitude towards their partner about this issue. But the mother is culturally preferred, even ignoring the fact that some mothers have had suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalizations or even that they do not even want to really take care of the kids.”
For her part, Luis Maria Assaneo, founder of Apradim (group of professionals who lecture on topics such as Enigmas of Manliness, Couples in Crisis, etc.), psychologist and professor at the Centre Two of psychological support and member of the Freudian School in Buenos Aires, agrees with Bouza and says: “laws that automatically give custody of children to mothers are obsolete, the father’s possibility to parent has evolved and it used to be the woman who stayed at home, while now both of them work outside the home.”
Ms. Maria Ruth extends the concept: “the mother has a bow gun in the first four years of life that she must not cut, but then both are capable of exerting the role of mother-father or father-mother and the kids could choose to be with one of them.”
Is there hope, father?
Sanchez says: “There are new psychological trends and it does not matter who does what, when and so on, as long as they can take care of the children. There is no such thing as why, who, when and where anymore, the most frequent question being how. These streams provide the ability to think in a concrete way and the family, the ex, the kids, the family reunions do not make the thing so individualistic.”
Maria advises: “ The tendency to be achieved should be that the family recurs to a break, regains homeostasis, finds a new equilibrium, but all tend to do that and everything is in order after a time of crisis. The Dad has to go, he expect a large internal piece of work to overcome this cut or break and it may be time for a re-learning, as there are parents who discover their parentage skills just when they leave.”
Jose Maria Bouzas suggests that the dads that have no children need to change and prepare the nest, becoming better for when they stick the leap and join the other in this adventure.”
Divorce Keeps Children Fit
My parents got divorced when I was about 4 years old and my little brother was just 9 months old. Their divorce was difficult and complicated, they were young (I was born when they were 16 1 / 2 years old and 21 years old).
My mother was very difficult and very nasty to my father. He did not deserve this.
One year later, my father met a woman. In fact, she was a girl as she was 18 at the time. They fell in love and she played dolls with us. It was nice.
I was more mature then. I was actually my little brother’s mother in less than five years.
My father and his girlfriend cooed quietly during all this time.
One day, everything changed.
I was so comfortable with my father, with his girlfriend and him, that I felt good. I asked my dad if I could live with him. I could not stand all these bad things my mother and those my mother said about him and his girlfriend.
I was enrolled in school, I was in CM2. My school year went very well.
My mother was there at the end of the school year, so I followed her naively. I had just turned 10 years. We went to get my brother in his class.
It was a difficult period. I wanted to live with Dad. I phoned my father in secret. I stole money from the races (5 or 10 cents per GB here and there, I quickly came to call my father) to get money for the cab.
We lived at home. Everything was going well until they had a child in 1988. My mother drank, smoked. She gave birth to a premature child, who was born after 7.5 months of pregnancy and weighed 2,200..
When my little brother (yes, my little brother, this baby they had together) was 6 months old, he had a serious gastrointestinal problem and he was hospitalized. Everything is now back to normal.
My father and my stepmother got married in September 1989. I didn’t attend his wedding. In 1991, she had another child, although she was drinking again and smoking like 10 firefighters. She gave birth two months earlier than the due date and the baby weighed 1,700. But this baby caught meningitis when he was just 15 days old '. He almost died, he had a number of lumbar punctures, so he was perforated all over his body. Now, he is 12 years old and he has these white traces on his palm, traces left by the infusions.
In short, nothing was too much. I had a little brother when I was 12 years old, another one when I was 15 and I was the one who raised them since their mother spent her time in front of the television, watching soap operas. I had to take care of the home, the kids and myself? Well, I worked well in school, but I was a mom before knowing what motherhood was.
Once, I was punished, cloistered in my room, no TV, just my books and music.
There was a huge difference between us and her children. I had to show her the holes in my shoes and tell her that I needed new ones, while she had an overflowing closet and she didn’t feel like she had enough shoes anyway!
She began to be jealous of me. Her 2 sons loved me as if I was their mother, they spent time with me and they were my first buddies. My father did nothing, he was working hard to feed his family and she told him her version of things.
I started law school when I was eighteen years old. I went to coffee more often than I went to classes. If a student gets a scholarship, the money is paid in the student's bank account and not in the parents’.
There was a huge scandal when I succeeded in winning a scholarship. She never gave me any money to go out, she never bought me clothes or shoes, she never took me shopping, so I had to do something on my own.
She searched my room regularly, read my intimate journal and told everybody that I was a "lazy" girl and that I didn’t care about anything ... (By the age of thirteen, she no longer wanted to wash my clothes!
I wanted to leave, but my father didn’t tell me anything, so why do it?
However, one day, my father told me to leave!
Then, I met a boy, who I fell in love with.
He also had a step-parent that was hard on him and threw him out, so we left our home and moved in together.
It’s been 8 1 / 2 years since then. I'm 27 years old and we are happy, we have 2 beautiful children, aged 5 and 16 months, and everything is fine between us.
I have not seen my father since and this is terribly bad. In fact, I am angry because of this. She won, but I decided to let them live in peace. She succeeded in destroying the very good relationship I had with my father. He does not even know my children.
And then I just heard they had to sell their house. They moved 1200 km away from us ...
Once, I sent him a letter telling him everything, so that I could take it all off my chest. This was a year ago ... He sent it back.
I know that everything is finished, she won and I'm the one who is shedding tears of grief.
I have not had an easy life. I cannot see my mother or my father or my brothers and I am suffering because of that!
So do not forget that there is nothing children can do in such situations. They cannot oppose a new love!
My mother was very difficult and very nasty to my father. He did not deserve this.
One year later, my father met a woman. In fact, she was a girl as she was 18 at the time. They fell in love and she played dolls with us. It was nice.
I was more mature then. I was actually my little brother’s mother in less than five years.
My father and his girlfriend cooed quietly during all this time.
One day, everything changed.
I was so comfortable with my father, with his girlfriend and him, that I felt good. I asked my dad if I could live with him. I could not stand all these bad things my mother and those my mother said about him and his girlfriend.
I was enrolled in school, I was in CM2. My school year went very well.
My mother was there at the end of the school year, so I followed her naively. I had just turned 10 years. We went to get my brother in his class.
It was a difficult period. I wanted to live with Dad. I phoned my father in secret. I stole money from the races (5 or 10 cents per GB here and there, I quickly came to call my father) to get money for the cab.
We lived at home. Everything was going well until they had a child in 1988. My mother drank, smoked. She gave birth to a premature child, who was born after 7.5 months of pregnancy and weighed 2,200..
When my little brother (yes, my little brother, this baby they had together) was 6 months old, he had a serious gastrointestinal problem and he was hospitalized. Everything is now back to normal.
My father and my stepmother got married in September 1989. I didn’t attend his wedding. In 1991, she had another child, although she was drinking again and smoking like 10 firefighters. She gave birth two months earlier than the due date and the baby weighed 1,700. But this baby caught meningitis when he was just 15 days old '. He almost died, he had a number of lumbar punctures, so he was perforated all over his body. Now, he is 12 years old and he has these white traces on his palm, traces left by the infusions.
In short, nothing was too much. I had a little brother when I was 12 years old, another one when I was 15 and I was the one who raised them since their mother spent her time in front of the television, watching soap operas. I had to take care of the home, the kids and myself? Well, I worked well in school, but I was a mom before knowing what motherhood was.
Once, I was punished, cloistered in my room, no TV, just my books and music.
There was a huge difference between us and her children. I had to show her the holes in my shoes and tell her that I needed new ones, while she had an overflowing closet and she didn’t feel like she had enough shoes anyway!
She began to be jealous of me. Her 2 sons loved me as if I was their mother, they spent time with me and they were my first buddies. My father did nothing, he was working hard to feed his family and she told him her version of things.
I started law school when I was eighteen years old. I went to coffee more often than I went to classes. If a student gets a scholarship, the money is paid in the student's bank account and not in the parents’.
There was a huge scandal when I succeeded in winning a scholarship. She never gave me any money to go out, she never bought me clothes or shoes, she never took me shopping, so I had to do something on my own.
She searched my room regularly, read my intimate journal and told everybody that I was a "lazy" girl and that I didn’t care about anything ... (By the age of thirteen, she no longer wanted to wash my clothes!
I wanted to leave, but my father didn’t tell me anything, so why do it?
However, one day, my father told me to leave!
Then, I met a boy, who I fell in love with.
He also had a step-parent that was hard on him and threw him out, so we left our home and moved in together.
It’s been 8 1 / 2 years since then. I'm 27 years old and we are happy, we have 2 beautiful children, aged 5 and 16 months, and everything is fine between us.
I have not seen my father since and this is terribly bad. In fact, I am angry because of this. She won, but I decided to let them live in peace. She succeeded in destroying the very good relationship I had with my father. He does not even know my children.
And then I just heard they had to sell their house. They moved 1200 km away from us ...
Once, I sent him a letter telling him everything, so that I could take it all off my chest. This was a year ago ... He sent it back.
I know that everything is finished, she won and I'm the one who is shedding tears of grief.
I have not had an easy life. I cannot see my mother or my father or my brothers and I am suffering because of that!
So do not forget that there is nothing children can do in such situations. They cannot oppose a new love!
When the Daughter Replaces the Paternal Love
Many unmarried or separated mothers worry that their daughters seek love relationships just to replace the absent parent. Here are some keys to understand and accompany them in their growth.
Many recently separated single mothers raising their children alone fear the fact that their children may want to get involved in love relationships in order to make up for their other parent’s absence.
Not being present when they grow, a father figure tends to be blurry for girls and they feel that their parents no longer love them.
When they reach adolescence, they embark on a journey that will help them really understand who their father is or is not. This process helps to form realistic expectations, which may prove to be painful and disappointing.
The essence of adolescence is establishing a person’s identity, establishing a sense of selfness as separate and distinct from the parents as possible.Therefore, there is no a priori reason to fear this process as it can also be an opportunity to strengthen the daughter’s identity.
They should work on their feelings for their father so that they can choose better relationships, not worse ones. While it may be true that the father loves his children as much as he can, although he was not present at their growth, it is also painful for him that he apparently has not been able to put his children’s needs first.
It is necessary to restrain the children so that they can develop and manage the situation as well as possible and, in order to do this, he must be careful not to project his own despair, frustration and fear onto them, as they probably cannot handle that situation.
Also, be aware of the possibility that your own anxieties can change the way your child judges the situations they are faced with. For example, you might react badly to one little boyfriend or to your daughter going out, which are normal things when she is an adolescent, just because you think she can handle the situation. Really, she probably can’t.
In other words, beware of projecting what you feel and what happens to you onto your daughter, as it is often unrelated to what is actually happening to her.
Do not underestimate her and help her find her pain. Identify her feelings, needs and everything she wants for her welfare. Believe in her, as well as in her ability to form healthy relationships.
Her ability to face the reality of the relationship she has with her father, plus the love and support she is given is something that is going to strengthen. Your daughter’s identity is not formed by her father’s actions, but they can help her understand herself.
Children only need a good parent to develop healthily. Even if you are willing to discuss their feelings and develop their own ability to become stronger and you are consistent in your discipline, your child will not have any reason to replace a family bond with a teenager. Instead, they will simply enjoy their dates.
Many recently separated single mothers raising their children alone fear the fact that their children may want to get involved in love relationships in order to make up for their other parent’s absence.
Not being present when they grow, a father figure tends to be blurry for girls and they feel that their parents no longer love them.
When they reach adolescence, they embark on a journey that will help them really understand who their father is or is not. This process helps to form realistic expectations, which may prove to be painful and disappointing.
The essence of adolescence is establishing a person’s identity, establishing a sense of selfness as separate and distinct from the parents as possible.Therefore, there is no a priori reason to fear this process as it can also be an opportunity to strengthen the daughter’s identity.
They should work on their feelings for their father so that they can choose better relationships, not worse ones. While it may be true that the father loves his children as much as he can, although he was not present at their growth, it is also painful for him that he apparently has not been able to put his children’s needs first.
It is necessary to restrain the children so that they can develop and manage the situation as well as possible and, in order to do this, he must be careful not to project his own despair, frustration and fear onto them, as they probably cannot handle that situation.
Also, be aware of the possibility that your own anxieties can change the way your child judges the situations they are faced with. For example, you might react badly to one little boyfriend or to your daughter going out, which are normal things when she is an adolescent, just because you think she can handle the situation. Really, she probably can’t.
In other words, beware of projecting what you feel and what happens to you onto your daughter, as it is often unrelated to what is actually happening to her.
Do not underestimate her and help her find her pain. Identify her feelings, needs and everything she wants for her welfare. Believe in her, as well as in her ability to form healthy relationships.
Her ability to face the reality of the relationship she has with her father, plus the love and support she is given is something that is going to strengthen. Your daughter’s identity is not formed by her father’s actions, but they can help her understand herself.
Children only need a good parent to develop healthily. Even if you are willing to discuss their feelings and develop their own ability to become stronger and you are consistent in your discipline, your child will not have any reason to replace a family bond with a teenager. Instead, they will simply enjoy their dates.
What a Grandparent Should Know About Their Grandchildren Being at Risk
There are many things you can do to help your grandchildren as a grandparent.
If you fear that there might be a kidnapping of your grandchild, teach them how to dial an emergency telephone number. By the age of three, they must know your address, your telephone area code and your phone number well enough.
Tell them you love them forever, that you will never let someone take them away and that you will go in their pursuit if something happens.
Reassure them by telling them that they are safe no matter what they hear from others or what they say.
Try to teach them to connect with strangers that may be of assistance, such as bar waiters, naphtha dispatchers, police, teachers or shop assistants, so they can ask for help in case of emergency.
Explain what "kidnapping" means. Teach your grandchild to shout "I'm being kidnapped! Call the police!" Tell them that when they are asked what they need, they should talk about the "judge", so that people understand the seriousness of the problem.
Let them understand that they must always be honest with the judge, no matter what others tell you. If you have custody, learn to say “The judge says I have to live with my grandfather because my parents have problems” (for example).
Choose a code word that only you and your grandchild know. Test your teachings, see if their aunt, mom or best friend knows the secret word and make sure you both remember the word. Change your code word if you believe your grandson or daughter may have mentioned it to someone.
Designate third parties to whom they should call if you consider the parent to be a risk when you are away. Explain that they can call you or the police anytime, anywhere and if they have any questions. Notify the authorities to ban the children from leaving the city without permission.
Listen and observe. If a parent does not have custody, but they quit their job, disconnected the telephone service or sold their home or possessions, something is wrong. Call your lawyer and get the visits supervised until the parent relocates back into the city.
Enter the driver's license number of the parents, the color of their car, the model and the year. Store any data about the in-laws, friends and co-workers.
You may take full-face photos of your grandchildren and both parents twice a year and note their physical description including weight, height and eye and hair color. Approximately 15% of the children abducted are recovered by the photographs.
If needed, call the police and a lawyer experienced in family law immediately. Time is critical. The police can enable location services and the information sector and access tracks and traces belonging to your grandson, as well as promptly contact any potential witnesses to the abduction. Also, contact NGOs such as Missing Children, which are active in several countries.
Protect your grandchild and yourself. Get legal custody, guardianship or adoption. Without them, you have little legal recourse to defend and be defended.
If you fear that there might be a kidnapping of your grandchild, teach them how to dial an emergency telephone number. By the age of three, they must know your address, your telephone area code and your phone number well enough.
Tell them you love them forever, that you will never let someone take them away and that you will go in their pursuit if something happens.
Reassure them by telling them that they are safe no matter what they hear from others or what they say.
Try to teach them to connect with strangers that may be of assistance, such as bar waiters, naphtha dispatchers, police, teachers or shop assistants, so they can ask for help in case of emergency.
Explain what "kidnapping" means. Teach your grandchild to shout "I'm being kidnapped! Call the police!" Tell them that when they are asked what they need, they should talk about the "judge", so that people understand the seriousness of the problem.
Let them understand that they must always be honest with the judge, no matter what others tell you. If you have custody, learn to say “The judge says I have to live with my grandfather because my parents have problems” (for example).
Choose a code word that only you and your grandchild know. Test your teachings, see if their aunt, mom or best friend knows the secret word and make sure you both remember the word. Change your code word if you believe your grandson or daughter may have mentioned it to someone.
Designate third parties to whom they should call if you consider the parent to be a risk when you are away. Explain that they can call you or the police anytime, anywhere and if they have any questions. Notify the authorities to ban the children from leaving the city without permission.
Listen and observe. If a parent does not have custody, but they quit their job, disconnected the telephone service or sold their home or possessions, something is wrong. Call your lawyer and get the visits supervised until the parent relocates back into the city.
Enter the driver's license number of the parents, the color of their car, the model and the year. Store any data about the in-laws, friends and co-workers.
You may take full-face photos of your grandchildren and both parents twice a year and note their physical description including weight, height and eye and hair color. Approximately 15% of the children abducted are recovered by the photographs.
If needed, call the police and a lawyer experienced in family law immediately. Time is critical. The police can enable location services and the information sector and access tracks and traces belonging to your grandson, as well as promptly contact any potential witnesses to the abduction. Also, contact NGOs such as Missing Children, which are active in several countries.
Protect your grandchild and yourself. Get legal custody, guardianship or adoption. Without them, you have little legal recourse to defend and be defended.
The Parent-Child Relationship and Children's Reactions
The marriage and the parent-child system are two different subsystems of the family. The separation between the spouses resumes itself to the partner relationship, but the two partners remain the children’s parents. However, the parent-child relationships will change in the months and years to come. If there is contact with both parents, there is the maternal and the paternal household for the children and they are part of the "binuclear family system".
Separately, the survivors must still agree on their children’s education. Some manage to separate the parental role from the partner role and keep the children out of conflict with the former spouses, while others cannot do this. This article focuses on the development of the parent-child relationships after separation. Since most children remain with their mother, we shall refer more to the absent father. It is mostly analogous in the rare cases in which the children remain with their father.
After the separation, mothers are suddenly more or less solely responsible for their children. However, this situation is not so new to them, since they are already wearing the main burden of child rearing and household chores ever since they get married. Rather, given the many routine tasks and the common fate in the family home, they get to have continuity in their life.
In addition, children are often a source of courage and emotional support. Above all, a positive parent-child relationship can make the people involved endure the separation and makes it easier to manage. However, in this situation, there is the risk that mothers transfer all their love to their children or they focus on them in order to fill the emptiness inside. The mothers who experienced the absence of parents in their childhood themselves often react with a loss of over-anxious, clinging or overprotective parenting. Therefore, it is easy to form symbiotic relationships. Sometimes, children are also forced to substitute partners and the parent in question becomes dependent on them, as they need someone familiar in their lives.
In other cases, it leads to neglect of the children, a lack of behavioral control or the formation of an inconsistent educational style. There could be many reasons for this:
(1) The mother is employed or has just taken another job. Now she has time for her children, she suddenly has to leave them in a day nursery, a daycare center or a place of refuge for a shorter period of time. Given all the stress and the tension, she has less patience with her children and often reacts with corporal punishment.
(2) The mother is so concerned with herself and she is so busy with the problems resulting from the separation that her children's needs for affection, love, encouragement and so on are not fulfilled anymore. This is especially true in the event that they become depressed or suffering from mental disorders. In all these cases, an older child is often turned into a parent. They take a more or less large share of the housework and the education of the younger siblings.
Many mothers expect their children to develop normally after the separation. They spend less time worrying about their emotional reactions or they overlook them. Many children learn that they have no support from their mothers in this crisis. In other cases, this worry for their welfare is very large. They contribute to the public opinion, according to which children are the main victims of separation and divorce.
Lone parents observe the social environment and are more attentive to mix teachers and employees of this agency in their education more often. Some mothers have a strong relationship with their children, watch them closely for their reactions to the separation and try to compensate for the negative consequences. They would often like to be perfect parents, to compensate for the low self-esteem or highlight their strength against the former partners. For mothers, it is particularly distressing when their children have behavior problems. They feel incompetent to develop anxiety or depression.
The influence of the absent parent is very pronounced, especially in the case of younger children. For example, if the mothers accept their former partner’s parental rights at the end of their marriage and accept their children to visit them for relaxation, leisure, self-fulfillment and maintenance of the new relationships, they often promote the contact, too. In other cases, they forbid their children to express their feelings of grief over the father's absence. They try to stop the visits by offering more attractive alternatives or by asking questions like "You don’t really want to meet your father, do you?" They often expect children to take their side, to approve the separation and to blame the father for it.
Even if you divorce and there is no principle of fault, it is still true that most people divorce, but only one can accept the emotional blame. In many cases, the father is also faced with the reluctance of children, which can be compared with that induced by the mother or through psychological pressure, threats, lies, slander or displays of disapproval and distaste for questions.
It is not surprising that children experience intense loyalty conflicts under these circumstances. They love both parents and usually maintain the relationship with both of them and they do it right. Now they are under strong pressure when it comes to making a decision. Some children can openly express these mental conflicts and discuss with familiar people, while others may not show it and must solve their interior conflicts.
Young people may be different from the expectations of their parents because of their greater independence. They establish a relationship with their father against the resistance imposed by the mother and they continue to make independent judgments about their parents’ behavior. They resist if they are drawn into conflicts and show their anger openly when a parent talks bad about the other. In addition, some get away from their parents and spend a lot more time with their peers instead of staying with their parents.
While many children continue the relationship with both parents, others opt for one of them for the following reasons:
(1) small children are still dependent on their mother, they need to accept their influence and therefore take their side;
(2) younger children see the myth of perfect parents destroyed by the separation. Feelings of anger and disappointment result in them because of their other parent’s absence and they reject them, especially when such behavior is encouraged by the attendees;
(3) some children express solidarity with the mother because they live with her, experience her problems first hand and feel the urge to show empathy and to give her emotional support;
(4) some children choose the weaker or the parent suffering more problems because they need their help more;
(5) young children sometimes turn to the father because of the way they are treated when they visit him. They may be showered with gifts and he may put less value on obedience. Daily living with the mother seems far less attractive because she assigns homework, checks the school work, makes them have respect for order and punishes them more; and
(6) older children take one parent’s side because of the inner necessity to clarify the question of right and wrong. However, a parent may be idealized. The resulting behavior is often certified and rewarded.
Many children have specific roles in the separation phase, such as that of the alliance partner, agent, informant or accomplice, messenger of secrets, unless they previously occupied them. They enjoy the beginning and the certain powers of the respective roles, but often pre-consciously remember that they are exploited. Roles such as the replacement of the partner can accelerate the children's development, but often overwhelm them and prevent their participation in age-appropriate activities. Children may have been allies with the father before the separation and are now often made scapegoats or receive less support.
Particularly young children show a clinging behavior in the separation phase. They feel more secure with the father, although he left. Now they are afraid that the mother could be cast in and this is often fueled by fear or by the fact that the mother is employed and has less time for her children than before. They often share their love and affection or their new interests with their lovers. Under such circumstances, children have some behavioral problems. They want attention from their mothers and feel the need to test their love. They also experience negative reactions as reinforcement and as evidence that they care about this situation. Some children have a really aggressive behavior because this is the only way they can express their anger at the absent father or because they are afraid to get too close (be captured in a symbiotic relationship).
Some children are very afraid of developing and even register a decrease in their development. These reactions are often caused by being overprotected and spoiled by their mothers. If children fear for their mothers’ mental health or fear that they might commit suicide, they sometimes stay at home for flimsy reasons. Their behavior reminds everyone of a school phobia.
Changes in the father-child relationship
Particularly strong changes occur in the relationship between children and fathers (or the absent parent). Usually, they meet each other only on weekends. Many fathers feel uprooted, separated from their children and perceive this experience as a traumatic one, develop feelings of guilt towards them and think they have failed as fathers. They also lose their self-esteem, as they do not have the status of a responsible family man.
Even fathers who hardly miss the way they used to take care of their children before the separation often get close to their children daily, although they may be surprised. They regret that they have done so little for them so far, they feel strong pain and fear that they will be forgotten soon. They suddenly begin to closely devote to their children. They often find that they can begin doing this during the visits of their little children.
Due to the fact that their home is not set up appropriately, they spend much time with them on game or sports fields, in restaurants, in cinemas or at the zoo. They walk with them or take them on trips. In most of the cases, they take no more responsibility for their education, they are very permissive and they do not care about their school performance.
Other fathers have gained little experience with their children before and after the separation and ask grandparents or friends for help. They learn over time how to best deal with children. Many fathers also reduce the number and duration of the contacts when they realize that their children visit them when bored and dissatisfied, when they experience the meeting as a burden or always return to their former partner and forget about them. They are little inclined to fight for their children if the mothers are trying to restrict the contacts. This is particularly true for fathers of very young children, who generally exercise their visitation rights very rarely.
Fathers experience strong feelings of loss and loneliness after spending time with their children, particularly after the separation. Other fathers, however, try to preserve the close relationship with their children. They try to set up a nursery in their apartment, to involve their children in their everyday lives (for example, they can help with the budget), they take care of their homework and play with them a lot. Things are particularly problematic when their former partners try to stop visiting contacts. Then they fight with all their strength for their right and to be allowed to continue to educate their children. Fathers with continuous contact with their children suffer less from depression and the children are often a source of emotional support.
For children, the separation from the absent parent (i.e. mostly the father) is a particularly big loss, especially if they are still quite young, if they had an intense relationship with them or if they had already suffered major losses (such as the death of a beloved grandparent). Therefore, it is better for the children if they can maintain the contact with their father as often as possible, the quality of their visits usually being more important than the quantity.
In many cases, there is alienation between fathers and children. They may even come to idealize the absent parent, especially if there is very restricted contact. Some children identify with them and even take on their characteristics and properties. On the other hand, they may also see their father as the negative model. Then, the positive experiences are displaced and they will be rejected violently. Some children also inherit anxiety traits that the “bad” parent used to have. It is obvious that strong links to the father persist even in these cases. The problem is that, due to the lack of contact, neither the ideal image and the positive fantasies nor the negative attitudes and ideas can be tested against reality. While the former lead to conflicts with the present parent, the latter are often encouraged.
Children behave very differently when visiting their fathers. Small children are looking forward to the meeting, provided that bonds already exist. However, they are often restless, as if the visit takes half a day longer, but they are not longer if they get used to separation from their mothers. Even older children can look forward to the meetings, especially when they are interesting and varied. They enjoy it when their fathers are exclusively devoted to them, when they go out with them and spoil them. Sometimes, they even want them to see them more and every day, living with their mothers being associated with more privation and obligations they want to escape from.
Older children are often curious about their father’s new life. They often look for signs of affection and appreciation. Sometimes, they are committed to the visit and delay their leaving at the end of the visit or bring about the reconciliation of their parents. It also happens that they blame their father for the separation, they are biased against them, they feel rejected by them and so they are often disobedient and rude. Older children and young people often avoid any kind of contact, especially if their mothers or fathers were violent to them or still are. Young people are looking forward to visits only if they have similar interests as their fathers and can communicate with them well. They want to set the time and frequency of the contacts.
Some parents report negative effects of visits, but this is often exaggerated. In addition, parents often interpret their children’s reaction in an opposite way. For example, the children feel sad at the end of the visit as a sign of the pain caused by the separation and they tell their mother that the visit has gone terribly. There are also many behavioral problems the children have and that occur before the visits, but that are not explained by the mother beforehand (like inducing aversion to the fathers, banning on positive feelings when speaking bad of the other and pain or anger being expressed when the visits take place).
Negative reactions after visits to the absent parent are very rare if the custodial parent only experienced few conflicts with them, the absent parent being accepted in their lives and their parenting style being tolerated. In these cases, indeed, the better the relationship between the present parent and the children from the point of view of the educational task, the less it is experienced as stressful.
Reactions of children
Children experience separation differently than adults. They do not see it as an opportunity for a new beginning, but as the loss of a parent, as a loss of love, affection, support and belonging. Since most children are quite young at the time of the separation, this falls into the most important years for their development and therefore shapes their behavior and experience, their self-image and their settings. It works well on young people and on already grown children. The general relationship with both parents depends on the children’s reactions, their gender, their age, their behavior, the quality of the relationship between the former spouses, on the conditions of separation (whether it occurred suddenly or after a long dispute) and the external factors (such as location or change of school, enrollment in the nursery or excessive lowering of living standards). It is also of importance to the other caretakers that the children respond to the separation (whether they see it as a normal process or as a disaster for those involved) and to what extent they follow the same negative offset.
For many children, their parents’ separation is a confusing and unsettling situation. First, it is a big shock for those who experienced only a few marital conflicts or who assessed their parents’ relationship as being stable. On the other hand, many children lack the background and causes of the separation and get very little information about the expected changes in their lives.
Even older children and young people are often faced with inadequate, one-sided or incomplete information. They often have no say, for instance, as far as the future living conditions and the provisional custody and visitation arrangements are concerned. Their parents’ failed marriage often ends up being a model for the children. They form a negative image of their future and develop great fears in their minds. For example, they fear that they are no longer loved, that their needs are no longer satisfied or that they will lose their attending parent once and for all. Their fear and insecurity are often reinforced by their parents, who have little time for them and are often irritated or impatient. Their confusion is even greater when the separation also involves one partner moving out. Then, the new reality is accepted as greyer.
Many adult children react to the separation of her parents with grief, which affects a lot of the areas of their lives and influences their development. Also, this often leads to depression, especially if the parents are depressed, if the child feels rejected and abandoned or if they cannot express their anger at one parent. Children often suffer more when their parents are also in grief.
Many children experience feelings of rage and anger after the separation. They are angry because they feel rejected, because both their parents have less time for them or because they must take into account the bad material situation, which results in more frustrations. They like showing their anger at the absent parent (the one who has left the family), the present one (the one who has driven the other). Boys act out their anger, especially if their father is violent because they identify themselves with them and they have a sense of power and masculinity or if they get the impression that they can control the situation and they are ultimately powerless. Some children deny their anger or express it indirectly (for example, in nightmares, tics, compulsions and depression).
Some children experience feelings of guilt. They believe that they are responsible for the divorce. For example, they feel guilty because they were bad or they had behavior problems before the separation, because they are disabled or because they were supposed to strengthen the marriage. Younger children see the negative sides even more clearly and they do not gain any security and safety. Guilt can also be caused by the fact that a child takes sides, agrees to the separation or expresses or experiences hostile emotions towards their parents. The statement "I am guilty" leaves the impression of control over a seemingly uncontrollable situation. Guilt can lead to children taking a scapegoat role or their punishment to be achieved through behavioral experiments.
The separation of parents leads many children to having low self-esteem. They realize that they have been left by one of the parents, blame their own worthlessness for that, consider themselves to be unlovable and therefore develop a negative self-image. Therefore, low self-esteem can also result and they can perceive themselves as failures because they did not succeed in keeping their family united. Furthermore, the negative self-image is caused by the fact that children are disloyal to one parent or that they are transformed into replacement for the partner or confidants. Also, they are imposed to take adult duties, although they are also children.
Other reactions to the separation of parents would be fear of the future, confusion, disbelief and hope for a reconciliation of the parents. For some children, divorce is a relief since they do not have to live in a conflict-ridden (or even violent) atmosphere anymore. Marital conflicts were hidden from them or denied and they could only imagine this. However, they can trust their own perceptions again now. Some children take their parents’ separation as inevitable and behave quite passively.
Others turn outwards and focus on school performance, sports, music, art or other activities. Many children look after their separated parents and help them to adapt by behaving like adults. This behavior is often reinforced by the attending parent, the child becoming a substitute for the partner and being trusted or using the time and energy to fulfill their duties. Appropriateness may also result from the fact that children can let go of their feelings of powerlessness and helplessness this way or they want to be good especially because they do not want to violate the remaining parent. Particularly problematic is the fact that such behavior is not recognized as striking.
Many children deny or repress their emotional reactions to their parents’ separation. Their suffering takes place in secret and often in great loneliness. Some of these children believe their parents expect them to they hide their emotions and problems, while others are encouraged with statements like "Be brave" or "Boys do not cry". Some children are banned when it comes expressing their feelings about the absent parent. Others want their troubled and depressed parents not to have to deal with their worries and stress. In most of these cases, however, they express their repressed feelings and problems indirectly, often not in very acceptable ways.
Thus, many children have behavior problems after their parents' separation, which may be different depending on age and sex of the children. For example, boys tend to react aggressively, while girls tend to withdraw or to adapt, their symptoms being overlooked easily. However, a closer examination is often required in that the behavioral problems may have already occurred before the separation. This is especially the case if children were exposed to long family conflicts or they have been involved in pathogenic roles.
Otherwise, the causes of behavior problems lie less in the way the separation has occurred and more in the way this situation is dealt with. The probability of a minor behaving like this is given by whether this situation was acute in the separation period (in younger children) or a good relationship with a constant caregiver already developed in the small child (older children). Also, these problems may appear when the children live in a structured environment after the separation, one with clearly defined rules, roles and responsibilities.
On the other hand, , the likelihood of greater behavior problems increases if many changes occur after the separation. They lead to a loss of continuity and security, so children find it more difficult to cope with the crisis. For young children, the loss is particularly big when the mother is employed after the separation. Most behavior problems occur only in the short term. They are often an unconscious attempt to make the parents care for the welfare of their child together. They rarely require therapeutic treatment. It is also noted that no immediate reaction to the separation from parents is observed in many cases.
Reactions of young children
As already mentioned, age-specific responses to their parents getting separated can be seen even in children. Infants should hardly notice the father’s absence. For them, the biggest risk is that the mothers are so loaded with the resulting problems and their psychological conflicts that they neglect their children. They sometimes develop eating disorders or sleep disorders, become irritable or calm down and have little comfort. Small children often have fewer problems, but also need to get used to a constant caregiver or a present partner of the parent to accept the new one as a psychological parent.
Children aged two to six are aware of the loss of a parent and focusing on the impact of the separation and on understanding it. Given the fact that they have not yet developed cognitive skills, they cannot get a realistic picture of the situation and extent of the loss. They are usually sufficiently separated from their parents and the consequences, they are provided information on the record or not, but they do not understand the reasons. Therefore, they do not know the reasons for the divorce disputes since children argue with their playmates and siblings, but then reconcile again.
Given the fact that they do not understand the causes of their parents’ separation, they often blame themselves for it. Understanding the new situation is made more difficult for them and small children do not have a remedy for conflict. A further difficulty is that they do not have their sense of time trained and they lack life experience to know that a separation leads to a temporary crisis.
Some young children argue that their father or their mother still lives with them or visits them secretly. They often report these fantasies in kindergarten. Many preschool children develop strong separation anxiety and general anxiety, which can result in a clinging behavior. They fear that they could be left in the lurch. Some children regress under these circumstances because they unconsciously want to be cared for and loved like babies. They usually suffer from enuresis (bed wetting), eating and sleeping disorders, for example. These are often make the attending parents react with anger and punishment as they do not understand the symptoms and do not try to help their children with love and affection.
Some preschool children are confused and agitated, aggressive, irritated or defiant, sad and depressed after their parents separate. Some withdraw and run away. They draw the unconscious conclusion that relationships can break and now have little confidence in the reliability of human relations because of their parents’ separations. If they always have to get used to new caregivers or changing partners of their parents, their binding ability can decrease more and more over time.
Very often, the behavior of preschool children also varies according to the separation of their parents. They show less endurance and stamina, they are less cooperative and more likely to watch other children play rather than participate in it. They also perform tasks less frequently and use less of their imagination. In kindergarten, these small children are looking for more attention, support and closeness from the teachers. They are often anxious, tearful, inattentive and inactive. Especially boys often show aggressive behavior that can cause them to be shunned by their peers. They sometimes get less help from the teachers.
Reactions of schoolchildren
Children up to 12 years old understand the changes that come from their parents’ separation better than younger children. They are often worried whether their parents will take care of them as before. As they experience the separation as a threat to their existence, they often feel abandoned and helpless and they are afraid of the future.
As toddlers, they feel a strong desire for their parents to reconcile, but rather recognize and accept the finality of the separation rather than the new situation. At the same time, they also tend to compare their own family relationships with those of other children and to deal with what their peers think of them. Very often, they are ashamed and hide their parents’ separation or feel isolated, especially if they believe they are the only ones in their class who have separated parents.
In contrast to infants, older children are turned into confidants, allies or partners of their parents, they take sides and hold one of the parents responsible for the breakup of the family. When parents are depressed or threaten to commit suicide, they are very worried about them, shift all the energy on the family and therefore neglect school and their friends.
But in other cases, this often leads to the deterioration of their school performance or to delays, truancy, daydreaming, problems with peers or disturbances in their social behavior. Some children behave well and easily adapt to their teachers, becoming their favorite students. Many students get no sympathy and no support in school because the teachers are not informed of the new family situation or because the parents expect the children to be provided the same services as before the separation. Many teachers expect to see negative consequences of the separation or single parenting and, therefore, react differently to the affected students, so they often find self-fulfilling prophecies.
Reactions of seven-to twelve-year-old children on the separation of their parents also include restlessness, nervousness, irritability, moodiness, difficulty concentrating, sadness, pain, depression, anger, aggressiveness, isolation (loneliness), guilt, loyalty conflicts, insomnia, nightmares, stomach discomfort, headache and other similar symptoms. Some children can be very hard to discipline at home or run away from home, while others show a clinging behavior. Girls often develop a negative attitude towards the male gender and boys are insecure in their social behavior (if the father is, too).
The absent parent is asked to be present in order to provide help with the children’s symptoms or they are called to talk about their behavior. This reinforces the children's hopes for reconciliation of their parents and, therefore, behavioral problems and school problems appear. Older children look for other people’s support and more helpful people (such as teachers, counselors, school psychologists), but this is often prevented due to the positive impact of the training on their behavioral problems, which are often reversed. For example, grandparents often show them love and affection. They help them understand their parents, they meet their needs and they let them express their desires. Many grandparents also stir up loyalty conflicts.
Reactions of young people
Children over 13 years experience the separation of their parents relatively rarely as most divorces occur in the first years of marriage. They often expect it, so they react less surprised. Sometimes, they are even glad that the time of tensions and frequent conflicts is over. Unlike younger children, adolescents usually have a realistic view of divorce. They prefer to accept the new situation and only rarely make illusions about a possible reconciliation of their parents. However, they also experience reactions such as anger, sorrow, pain or shame, which depend on the strength and quality and, above all, on the intensity of the relationship with the absent parent and their importance as a model.
Many young people grow up very fast after their parents separate. Others find it difficult to cope with the phase-specific development tasks, as they have lost the "safety net" of the family. They experience the problems of adolescence and youth and get little support and assistance on the way to adulthood. Some young people consume alcohol and drugs, have premature sexual relations and are aggressive or delinquents. They often think about their partnerships and their partners and they are afraid not to repeat the mistakes their parents made in their relationships.
Unlike younger children, young people are more emotional and keep the distance or multiply the number of the activities they do with their friends. They refuse to be drawn into the conflict. They also emphasize their autonomy and they react very angrily if they are not consulted regarding the custody and control or the right to stick to the fixed visiting hours. Many adolescents respond to their parents sensitively and make constructive contributions when it comes to addressing the separation situation. Some take over too much responsibility for the mental welfare of their parents or conduct the family. They neglect school, vocational training and friends in order to act as parents. Unlike younger children, young people also have very many opportunities to discuss their parents’ separation when they have problems with their peers, grandparents, adult friends or professionals.
Siblings often help each other during the processing of grief, pain, fear and anger. They cooperate with each other due to their parents’ expectations to support each other. Older siblings often lead the young to realistically assess the new situation and to accept the loss of a parent. In other cases, siblings form coalitions against one or both parents or against each other (they are out of their sense of justice) or they take sides. The sibling subsystem can be split by the parents as well. Finally, it may happen that the sisters alienate each other and go separate ways, as they judge the separation situation from different points and react differently.
Separately, the survivors must still agree on their children’s education. Some manage to separate the parental role from the partner role and keep the children out of conflict with the former spouses, while others cannot do this. This article focuses on the development of the parent-child relationships after separation. Since most children remain with their mother, we shall refer more to the absent father. It is mostly analogous in the rare cases in which the children remain with their father.
After the separation, mothers are suddenly more or less solely responsible for their children. However, this situation is not so new to them, since they are already wearing the main burden of child rearing and household chores ever since they get married. Rather, given the many routine tasks and the common fate in the family home, they get to have continuity in their life.
In addition, children are often a source of courage and emotional support. Above all, a positive parent-child relationship can make the people involved endure the separation and makes it easier to manage. However, in this situation, there is the risk that mothers transfer all their love to their children or they focus on them in order to fill the emptiness inside. The mothers who experienced the absence of parents in their childhood themselves often react with a loss of over-anxious, clinging or overprotective parenting. Therefore, it is easy to form symbiotic relationships. Sometimes, children are also forced to substitute partners and the parent in question becomes dependent on them, as they need someone familiar in their lives.
In other cases, it leads to neglect of the children, a lack of behavioral control or the formation of an inconsistent educational style. There could be many reasons for this:
(1) The mother is employed or has just taken another job. Now she has time for her children, she suddenly has to leave them in a day nursery, a daycare center or a place of refuge for a shorter period of time. Given all the stress and the tension, she has less patience with her children and often reacts with corporal punishment.
(2) The mother is so concerned with herself and she is so busy with the problems resulting from the separation that her children's needs for affection, love, encouragement and so on are not fulfilled anymore. This is especially true in the event that they become depressed or suffering from mental disorders. In all these cases, an older child is often turned into a parent. They take a more or less large share of the housework and the education of the younger siblings.
Many mothers expect their children to develop normally after the separation. They spend less time worrying about their emotional reactions or they overlook them. Many children learn that they have no support from their mothers in this crisis. In other cases, this worry for their welfare is very large. They contribute to the public opinion, according to which children are the main victims of separation and divorce.
Lone parents observe the social environment and are more attentive to mix teachers and employees of this agency in their education more often. Some mothers have a strong relationship with their children, watch them closely for their reactions to the separation and try to compensate for the negative consequences. They would often like to be perfect parents, to compensate for the low self-esteem or highlight their strength against the former partners. For mothers, it is particularly distressing when their children have behavior problems. They feel incompetent to develop anxiety or depression.
The influence of the absent parent is very pronounced, especially in the case of younger children. For example, if the mothers accept their former partner’s parental rights at the end of their marriage and accept their children to visit them for relaxation, leisure, self-fulfillment and maintenance of the new relationships, they often promote the contact, too. In other cases, they forbid their children to express their feelings of grief over the father's absence. They try to stop the visits by offering more attractive alternatives or by asking questions like "You don’t really want to meet your father, do you?" They often expect children to take their side, to approve the separation and to blame the father for it.
Even if you divorce and there is no principle of fault, it is still true that most people divorce, but only one can accept the emotional blame. In many cases, the father is also faced with the reluctance of children, which can be compared with that induced by the mother or through psychological pressure, threats, lies, slander or displays of disapproval and distaste for questions.
It is not surprising that children experience intense loyalty conflicts under these circumstances. They love both parents and usually maintain the relationship with both of them and they do it right. Now they are under strong pressure when it comes to making a decision. Some children can openly express these mental conflicts and discuss with familiar people, while others may not show it and must solve their interior conflicts.
Young people may be different from the expectations of their parents because of their greater independence. They establish a relationship with their father against the resistance imposed by the mother and they continue to make independent judgments about their parents’ behavior. They resist if they are drawn into conflicts and show their anger openly when a parent talks bad about the other. In addition, some get away from their parents and spend a lot more time with their peers instead of staying with their parents.
While many children continue the relationship with both parents, others opt for one of them for the following reasons:
(1) small children are still dependent on their mother, they need to accept their influence and therefore take their side;
(2) younger children see the myth of perfect parents destroyed by the separation. Feelings of anger and disappointment result in them because of their other parent’s absence and they reject them, especially when such behavior is encouraged by the attendees;
(3) some children express solidarity with the mother because they live with her, experience her problems first hand and feel the urge to show empathy and to give her emotional support;
(4) some children choose the weaker or the parent suffering more problems because they need their help more;
(5) young children sometimes turn to the father because of the way they are treated when they visit him. They may be showered with gifts and he may put less value on obedience. Daily living with the mother seems far less attractive because she assigns homework, checks the school work, makes them have respect for order and punishes them more; and
(6) older children take one parent’s side because of the inner necessity to clarify the question of right and wrong. However, a parent may be idealized. The resulting behavior is often certified and rewarded.
Many children have specific roles in the separation phase, such as that of the alliance partner, agent, informant or accomplice, messenger of secrets, unless they previously occupied them. They enjoy the beginning and the certain powers of the respective roles, but often pre-consciously remember that they are exploited. Roles such as the replacement of the partner can accelerate the children's development, but often overwhelm them and prevent their participation in age-appropriate activities. Children may have been allies with the father before the separation and are now often made scapegoats or receive less support.
Particularly young children show a clinging behavior in the separation phase. They feel more secure with the father, although he left. Now they are afraid that the mother could be cast in and this is often fueled by fear or by the fact that the mother is employed and has less time for her children than before. They often share their love and affection or their new interests with their lovers. Under such circumstances, children have some behavioral problems. They want attention from their mothers and feel the need to test their love. They also experience negative reactions as reinforcement and as evidence that they care about this situation. Some children have a really aggressive behavior because this is the only way they can express their anger at the absent father or because they are afraid to get too close (be captured in a symbiotic relationship).
Some children are very afraid of developing and even register a decrease in their development. These reactions are often caused by being overprotected and spoiled by their mothers. If children fear for their mothers’ mental health or fear that they might commit suicide, they sometimes stay at home for flimsy reasons. Their behavior reminds everyone of a school phobia.
Changes in the father-child relationship
Particularly strong changes occur in the relationship between children and fathers (or the absent parent). Usually, they meet each other only on weekends. Many fathers feel uprooted, separated from their children and perceive this experience as a traumatic one, develop feelings of guilt towards them and think they have failed as fathers. They also lose their self-esteem, as they do not have the status of a responsible family man.
Even fathers who hardly miss the way they used to take care of their children before the separation often get close to their children daily, although they may be surprised. They regret that they have done so little for them so far, they feel strong pain and fear that they will be forgotten soon. They suddenly begin to closely devote to their children. They often find that they can begin doing this during the visits of their little children.
Due to the fact that their home is not set up appropriately, they spend much time with them on game or sports fields, in restaurants, in cinemas or at the zoo. They walk with them or take them on trips. In most of the cases, they take no more responsibility for their education, they are very permissive and they do not care about their school performance.
Other fathers have gained little experience with their children before and after the separation and ask grandparents or friends for help. They learn over time how to best deal with children. Many fathers also reduce the number and duration of the contacts when they realize that their children visit them when bored and dissatisfied, when they experience the meeting as a burden or always return to their former partner and forget about them. They are little inclined to fight for their children if the mothers are trying to restrict the contacts. This is particularly true for fathers of very young children, who generally exercise their visitation rights very rarely.
Fathers experience strong feelings of loss and loneliness after spending time with their children, particularly after the separation. Other fathers, however, try to preserve the close relationship with their children. They try to set up a nursery in their apartment, to involve their children in their everyday lives (for example, they can help with the budget), they take care of their homework and play with them a lot. Things are particularly problematic when their former partners try to stop visiting contacts. Then they fight with all their strength for their right and to be allowed to continue to educate their children. Fathers with continuous contact with their children suffer less from depression and the children are often a source of emotional support.
For children, the separation from the absent parent (i.e. mostly the father) is a particularly big loss, especially if they are still quite young, if they had an intense relationship with them or if they had already suffered major losses (such as the death of a beloved grandparent). Therefore, it is better for the children if they can maintain the contact with their father as often as possible, the quality of their visits usually being more important than the quantity.
In many cases, there is alienation between fathers and children. They may even come to idealize the absent parent, especially if there is very restricted contact. Some children identify with them and even take on their characteristics and properties. On the other hand, they may also see their father as the negative model. Then, the positive experiences are displaced and they will be rejected violently. Some children also inherit anxiety traits that the “bad” parent used to have. It is obvious that strong links to the father persist even in these cases. The problem is that, due to the lack of contact, neither the ideal image and the positive fantasies nor the negative attitudes and ideas can be tested against reality. While the former lead to conflicts with the present parent, the latter are often encouraged.
Children behave very differently when visiting their fathers. Small children are looking forward to the meeting, provided that bonds already exist. However, they are often restless, as if the visit takes half a day longer, but they are not longer if they get used to separation from their mothers. Even older children can look forward to the meetings, especially when they are interesting and varied. They enjoy it when their fathers are exclusively devoted to them, when they go out with them and spoil them. Sometimes, they even want them to see them more and every day, living with their mothers being associated with more privation and obligations they want to escape from.
Older children are often curious about their father’s new life. They often look for signs of affection and appreciation. Sometimes, they are committed to the visit and delay their leaving at the end of the visit or bring about the reconciliation of their parents. It also happens that they blame their father for the separation, they are biased against them, they feel rejected by them and so they are often disobedient and rude. Older children and young people often avoid any kind of contact, especially if their mothers or fathers were violent to them or still are. Young people are looking forward to visits only if they have similar interests as their fathers and can communicate with them well. They want to set the time and frequency of the contacts.
Some parents report negative effects of visits, but this is often exaggerated. In addition, parents often interpret their children’s reaction in an opposite way. For example, the children feel sad at the end of the visit as a sign of the pain caused by the separation and they tell their mother that the visit has gone terribly. There are also many behavioral problems the children have and that occur before the visits, but that are not explained by the mother beforehand (like inducing aversion to the fathers, banning on positive feelings when speaking bad of the other and pain or anger being expressed when the visits take place).
Negative reactions after visits to the absent parent are very rare if the custodial parent only experienced few conflicts with them, the absent parent being accepted in their lives and their parenting style being tolerated. In these cases, indeed, the better the relationship between the present parent and the children from the point of view of the educational task, the less it is experienced as stressful.
Reactions of children
Children experience separation differently than adults. They do not see it as an opportunity for a new beginning, but as the loss of a parent, as a loss of love, affection, support and belonging. Since most children are quite young at the time of the separation, this falls into the most important years for their development and therefore shapes their behavior and experience, their self-image and their settings. It works well on young people and on already grown children. The general relationship with both parents depends on the children’s reactions, their gender, their age, their behavior, the quality of the relationship between the former spouses, on the conditions of separation (whether it occurred suddenly or after a long dispute) and the external factors (such as location or change of school, enrollment in the nursery or excessive lowering of living standards). It is also of importance to the other caretakers that the children respond to the separation (whether they see it as a normal process or as a disaster for those involved) and to what extent they follow the same negative offset.
For many children, their parents’ separation is a confusing and unsettling situation. First, it is a big shock for those who experienced only a few marital conflicts or who assessed their parents’ relationship as being stable. On the other hand, many children lack the background and causes of the separation and get very little information about the expected changes in their lives.
Even older children and young people are often faced with inadequate, one-sided or incomplete information. They often have no say, for instance, as far as the future living conditions and the provisional custody and visitation arrangements are concerned. Their parents’ failed marriage often ends up being a model for the children. They form a negative image of their future and develop great fears in their minds. For example, they fear that they are no longer loved, that their needs are no longer satisfied or that they will lose their attending parent once and for all. Their fear and insecurity are often reinforced by their parents, who have little time for them and are often irritated or impatient. Their confusion is even greater when the separation also involves one partner moving out. Then, the new reality is accepted as greyer.
Many adult children react to the separation of her parents with grief, which affects a lot of the areas of their lives and influences their development. Also, this often leads to depression, especially if the parents are depressed, if the child feels rejected and abandoned or if they cannot express their anger at one parent. Children often suffer more when their parents are also in grief.
Many children experience feelings of rage and anger after the separation. They are angry because they feel rejected, because both their parents have less time for them or because they must take into account the bad material situation, which results in more frustrations. They like showing their anger at the absent parent (the one who has left the family), the present one (the one who has driven the other). Boys act out their anger, especially if their father is violent because they identify themselves with them and they have a sense of power and masculinity or if they get the impression that they can control the situation and they are ultimately powerless. Some children deny their anger or express it indirectly (for example, in nightmares, tics, compulsions and depression).
Some children experience feelings of guilt. They believe that they are responsible for the divorce. For example, they feel guilty because they were bad or they had behavior problems before the separation, because they are disabled or because they were supposed to strengthen the marriage. Younger children see the negative sides even more clearly and they do not gain any security and safety. Guilt can also be caused by the fact that a child takes sides, agrees to the separation or expresses or experiences hostile emotions towards their parents. The statement "I am guilty" leaves the impression of control over a seemingly uncontrollable situation. Guilt can lead to children taking a scapegoat role or their punishment to be achieved through behavioral experiments.
The separation of parents leads many children to having low self-esteem. They realize that they have been left by one of the parents, blame their own worthlessness for that, consider themselves to be unlovable and therefore develop a negative self-image. Therefore, low self-esteem can also result and they can perceive themselves as failures because they did not succeed in keeping their family united. Furthermore, the negative self-image is caused by the fact that children are disloyal to one parent or that they are transformed into replacement for the partner or confidants. Also, they are imposed to take adult duties, although they are also children.
Other reactions to the separation of parents would be fear of the future, confusion, disbelief and hope for a reconciliation of the parents. For some children, divorce is a relief since they do not have to live in a conflict-ridden (or even violent) atmosphere anymore. Marital conflicts were hidden from them or denied and they could only imagine this. However, they can trust their own perceptions again now. Some children take their parents’ separation as inevitable and behave quite passively.
Others turn outwards and focus on school performance, sports, music, art or other activities. Many children look after their separated parents and help them to adapt by behaving like adults. This behavior is often reinforced by the attending parent, the child becoming a substitute for the partner and being trusted or using the time and energy to fulfill their duties. Appropriateness may also result from the fact that children can let go of their feelings of powerlessness and helplessness this way or they want to be good especially because they do not want to violate the remaining parent. Particularly problematic is the fact that such behavior is not recognized as striking.
Many children deny or repress their emotional reactions to their parents’ separation. Their suffering takes place in secret and often in great loneliness. Some of these children believe their parents expect them to they hide their emotions and problems, while others are encouraged with statements like "Be brave" or "Boys do not cry". Some children are banned when it comes expressing their feelings about the absent parent. Others want their troubled and depressed parents not to have to deal with their worries and stress. In most of these cases, however, they express their repressed feelings and problems indirectly, often not in very acceptable ways.
Thus, many children have behavior problems after their parents' separation, which may be different depending on age and sex of the children. For example, boys tend to react aggressively, while girls tend to withdraw or to adapt, their symptoms being overlooked easily. However, a closer examination is often required in that the behavioral problems may have already occurred before the separation. This is especially the case if children were exposed to long family conflicts or they have been involved in pathogenic roles.
Otherwise, the causes of behavior problems lie less in the way the separation has occurred and more in the way this situation is dealt with. The probability of a minor behaving like this is given by whether this situation was acute in the separation period (in younger children) or a good relationship with a constant caregiver already developed in the small child (older children). Also, these problems may appear when the children live in a structured environment after the separation, one with clearly defined rules, roles and responsibilities.
On the other hand, , the likelihood of greater behavior problems increases if many changes occur after the separation. They lead to a loss of continuity and security, so children find it more difficult to cope with the crisis. For young children, the loss is particularly big when the mother is employed after the separation. Most behavior problems occur only in the short term. They are often an unconscious attempt to make the parents care for the welfare of their child together. They rarely require therapeutic treatment. It is also noted that no immediate reaction to the separation from parents is observed in many cases.
Reactions of young children
As already mentioned, age-specific responses to their parents getting separated can be seen even in children. Infants should hardly notice the father’s absence. For them, the biggest risk is that the mothers are so loaded with the resulting problems and their psychological conflicts that they neglect their children. They sometimes develop eating disorders or sleep disorders, become irritable or calm down and have little comfort. Small children often have fewer problems, but also need to get used to a constant caregiver or a present partner of the parent to accept the new one as a psychological parent.
Children aged two to six are aware of the loss of a parent and focusing on the impact of the separation and on understanding it. Given the fact that they have not yet developed cognitive skills, they cannot get a realistic picture of the situation and extent of the loss. They are usually sufficiently separated from their parents and the consequences, they are provided information on the record or not, but they do not understand the reasons. Therefore, they do not know the reasons for the divorce disputes since children argue with their playmates and siblings, but then reconcile again.
Given the fact that they do not understand the causes of their parents’ separation, they often blame themselves for it. Understanding the new situation is made more difficult for them and small children do not have a remedy for conflict. A further difficulty is that they do not have their sense of time trained and they lack life experience to know that a separation leads to a temporary crisis.
Some young children argue that their father or their mother still lives with them or visits them secretly. They often report these fantasies in kindergarten. Many preschool children develop strong separation anxiety and general anxiety, which can result in a clinging behavior. They fear that they could be left in the lurch. Some children regress under these circumstances because they unconsciously want to be cared for and loved like babies. They usually suffer from enuresis (bed wetting), eating and sleeping disorders, for example. These are often make the attending parents react with anger and punishment as they do not understand the symptoms and do not try to help their children with love and affection.
Some preschool children are confused and agitated, aggressive, irritated or defiant, sad and depressed after their parents separate. Some withdraw and run away. They draw the unconscious conclusion that relationships can break and now have little confidence in the reliability of human relations because of their parents’ separations. If they always have to get used to new caregivers or changing partners of their parents, their binding ability can decrease more and more over time.
Very often, the behavior of preschool children also varies according to the separation of their parents. They show less endurance and stamina, they are less cooperative and more likely to watch other children play rather than participate in it. They also perform tasks less frequently and use less of their imagination. In kindergarten, these small children are looking for more attention, support and closeness from the teachers. They are often anxious, tearful, inattentive and inactive. Especially boys often show aggressive behavior that can cause them to be shunned by their peers. They sometimes get less help from the teachers.
Reactions of schoolchildren
Children up to 12 years old understand the changes that come from their parents’ separation better than younger children. They are often worried whether their parents will take care of them as before. As they experience the separation as a threat to their existence, they often feel abandoned and helpless and they are afraid of the future.
As toddlers, they feel a strong desire for their parents to reconcile, but rather recognize and accept the finality of the separation rather than the new situation. At the same time, they also tend to compare their own family relationships with those of other children and to deal with what their peers think of them. Very often, they are ashamed and hide their parents’ separation or feel isolated, especially if they believe they are the only ones in their class who have separated parents.
In contrast to infants, older children are turned into confidants, allies or partners of their parents, they take sides and hold one of the parents responsible for the breakup of the family. When parents are depressed or threaten to commit suicide, they are very worried about them, shift all the energy on the family and therefore neglect school and their friends.
But in other cases, this often leads to the deterioration of their school performance or to delays, truancy, daydreaming, problems with peers or disturbances in their social behavior. Some children behave well and easily adapt to their teachers, becoming their favorite students. Many students get no sympathy and no support in school because the teachers are not informed of the new family situation or because the parents expect the children to be provided the same services as before the separation. Many teachers expect to see negative consequences of the separation or single parenting and, therefore, react differently to the affected students, so they often find self-fulfilling prophecies.
Reactions of seven-to twelve-year-old children on the separation of their parents also include restlessness, nervousness, irritability, moodiness, difficulty concentrating, sadness, pain, depression, anger, aggressiveness, isolation (loneliness), guilt, loyalty conflicts, insomnia, nightmares, stomach discomfort, headache and other similar symptoms. Some children can be very hard to discipline at home or run away from home, while others show a clinging behavior. Girls often develop a negative attitude towards the male gender and boys are insecure in their social behavior (if the father is, too).
The absent parent is asked to be present in order to provide help with the children’s symptoms or they are called to talk about their behavior. This reinforces the children's hopes for reconciliation of their parents and, therefore, behavioral problems and school problems appear. Older children look for other people’s support and more helpful people (such as teachers, counselors, school psychologists), but this is often prevented due to the positive impact of the training on their behavioral problems, which are often reversed. For example, grandparents often show them love and affection. They help them understand their parents, they meet their needs and they let them express their desires. Many grandparents also stir up loyalty conflicts.
Reactions of young people
Children over 13 years experience the separation of their parents relatively rarely as most divorces occur in the first years of marriage. They often expect it, so they react less surprised. Sometimes, they are even glad that the time of tensions and frequent conflicts is over. Unlike younger children, adolescents usually have a realistic view of divorce. They prefer to accept the new situation and only rarely make illusions about a possible reconciliation of their parents. However, they also experience reactions such as anger, sorrow, pain or shame, which depend on the strength and quality and, above all, on the intensity of the relationship with the absent parent and their importance as a model.
Many young people grow up very fast after their parents separate. Others find it difficult to cope with the phase-specific development tasks, as they have lost the "safety net" of the family. They experience the problems of adolescence and youth and get little support and assistance on the way to adulthood. Some young people consume alcohol and drugs, have premature sexual relations and are aggressive or delinquents. They often think about their partnerships and their partners and they are afraid not to repeat the mistakes their parents made in their relationships.
Unlike younger children, young people are more emotional and keep the distance or multiply the number of the activities they do with their friends. They refuse to be drawn into the conflict. They also emphasize their autonomy and they react very angrily if they are not consulted regarding the custody and control or the right to stick to the fixed visiting hours. Many adolescents respond to their parents sensitively and make constructive contributions when it comes to addressing the separation situation. Some take over too much responsibility for the mental welfare of their parents or conduct the family. They neglect school, vocational training and friends in order to act as parents. Unlike younger children, young people also have very many opportunities to discuss their parents’ separation when they have problems with their peers, grandparents, adult friends or professionals.
Siblings often help each other during the processing of grief, pain, fear and anger. They cooperate with each other due to their parents’ expectations to support each other. Older siblings often lead the young to realistically assess the new situation and to accept the loss of a parent. In other cases, siblings form coalitions against one or both parents or against each other (they are out of their sense of justice) or they take sides. The sibling subsystem can be split by the parents as well. Finally, it may happen that the sisters alienate each other and go separate ways, as they judge the separation situation from different points and react differently.
Prepare the Children for a New Partner
Saturday, January 1, 2011
at 11:07 AM 0 comments Labels: children and divorce, divorce, divorce advice
The first introduction of a new partner in your family requires a lot of sensitivity. Children often react with anger, jealousy or fear especially if they hope for a reconciliation of their parents. Tell them whether the relationship is likely to be temporary or a long-term one.
In the former case, it is less likely that an (older) child reacts with jealousy. They have loyalty conflicts and may try to sabotage the new relationship. As for smaller children, the risk that they develop ties to a new partner very quickly crashes a whole range of short-term conditions of the relationship. You should not confront them with each new friend immediately. Mowatt (1987) also made a few statements with respect to short-term sexual relationships. "Children aged four and below usually accept everything as natural, what their parents may do for children of school age. However, parents with strict moral principles may be surprised by the extent of their knowledge and may have false information about sex". You should think about your role model, but also about the sexual education of your children, this being part of the divorce advice for men and women available to all those facing this problem.
In a longer term relationship, you should address your children’s fear of losing contact with the other parent. Reassure them that they are allowed to visit the other parent as often as before. Tell them that the new partner will have no education functions, at least for now. Also, remember that children often feel threatened by the new partner. Your children need a lot of understanding and a lot of time in this situation, although you usually want to be together with your new partner right now, which is natural.
How can I help my kids with their problems?
Often you are only aware of your children’s problems in this stage. You may have been so preoccupied with yourselves and with adapting to the separation that you ignored or overlooked the psychological conflicts and behavior problems of your children.
In general, you should see the symptoms presented by your children as adaptive responses. The child’s behavior is a response to four stress factors:
(a) dysfunctional family relationships before the divorce,
(b) dysfunctional family relationships after the divorce;
(c) the child’s psychopathology before the divorce; and
(d) their individual reaction to the divorce.
The symptoms are just like a cry for help, expressing the children’s sorrow and anger.
If there are serious problems, you can opt for child guidance or child and adolescent psychotherapist attention. The consultant recurs to treating the child with all the usual forms of counseling and therapeutic approaches in use. They might play in therapy, for example, if the child in question is very young. They will often include measures to improve the parent-child relationship and your parenting. An older child can be treated individually, in a group and / or together with their parents. The latter case often has a particularly strong therapeutic effect especially if the young person's feelings and their psychic conflicts can be expressed and discussed properly.
Regardless of whether your child has developed behavioral problems and mental disorders or not, an advisor should help them in adapting to the situation. For example, they can help them to accept the finality of their parents’ divorce. They prove that any reconciliation fantasies, which can persist for years after the divorce and even after the remarriage of a parent, are unrealistic and that they should abandon their hopes (such as a friendly interaction between their parents) for reconciliation.
Sometimes, the consultant seeing an older child or a young person may also reach the conclusion that most of their problems would disappear if they could live with the other parent. They clarify the motives behind this desire (such as the desire to undo the reduced contact with the noncustodial parent).Occasionally, however, the consultant may also suggest that the parents approve the child’s request for a trial period. They can even determine if their expectations can be met or not.
If the causes of your child's psychic conflicts and behavior problems that they are suffering are still embroiled in disputes with your ex-partner or your child acts as if they had false major problems, the consultant may also only work with you. The consultant helps you to solve your problems, teaches you the finality of the divorce and improves your parenting, providing all the divorce advice for women and men you need. This way, they can indirectly help your children more. They also invite your divorced partner to the meetings or call them to talk to them about the child’s difficulties. Generally, it is best if both parents cooperate with regard to the child’s education and when it comes to dealing with their behavioral problems.
In the former case, it is less likely that an (older) child reacts with jealousy. They have loyalty conflicts and may try to sabotage the new relationship. As for smaller children, the risk that they develop ties to a new partner very quickly crashes a whole range of short-term conditions of the relationship. You should not confront them with each new friend immediately. Mowatt (1987) also made a few statements with respect to short-term sexual relationships. "Children aged four and below usually accept everything as natural, what their parents may do for children of school age. However, parents with strict moral principles may be surprised by the extent of their knowledge and may have false information about sex". You should think about your role model, but also about the sexual education of your children, this being part of the divorce advice for men and women available to all those facing this problem.
In a longer term relationship, you should address your children’s fear of losing contact with the other parent. Reassure them that they are allowed to visit the other parent as often as before. Tell them that the new partner will have no education functions, at least for now. Also, remember that children often feel threatened by the new partner. Your children need a lot of understanding and a lot of time in this situation, although you usually want to be together with your new partner right now, which is natural.
How can I help my kids with their problems?
Often you are only aware of your children’s problems in this stage. You may have been so preoccupied with yourselves and with adapting to the separation that you ignored or overlooked the psychological conflicts and behavior problems of your children.
In general, you should see the symptoms presented by your children as adaptive responses. The child’s behavior is a response to four stress factors:
(a) dysfunctional family relationships before the divorce,
(b) dysfunctional family relationships after the divorce;
(c) the child’s psychopathology before the divorce; and
(d) their individual reaction to the divorce.
The symptoms are just like a cry for help, expressing the children’s sorrow and anger.
If there are serious problems, you can opt for child guidance or child and adolescent psychotherapist attention. The consultant recurs to treating the child with all the usual forms of counseling and therapeutic approaches in use. They might play in therapy, for example, if the child in question is very young. They will often include measures to improve the parent-child relationship and your parenting. An older child can be treated individually, in a group and / or together with their parents. The latter case often has a particularly strong therapeutic effect especially if the young person's feelings and their psychic conflicts can be expressed and discussed properly.
Regardless of whether your child has developed behavioral problems and mental disorders or not, an advisor should help them in adapting to the situation. For example, they can help them to accept the finality of their parents’ divorce. They prove that any reconciliation fantasies, which can persist for years after the divorce and even after the remarriage of a parent, are unrealistic and that they should abandon their hopes (such as a friendly interaction between their parents) for reconciliation.
Sometimes, the consultant seeing an older child or a young person may also reach the conclusion that most of their problems would disappear if they could live with the other parent. They clarify the motives behind this desire (such as the desire to undo the reduced contact with the noncustodial parent).Occasionally, however, the consultant may also suggest that the parents approve the child’s request for a trial period. They can even determine if their expectations can be met or not.
If the causes of your child's psychic conflicts and behavior problems that they are suffering are still embroiled in disputes with your ex-partner or your child acts as if they had false major problems, the consultant may also only work with you. The consultant helps you to solve your problems, teaches you the finality of the divorce and improves your parenting, providing all the divorce advice for women and men you need. This way, they can indirectly help your children more. They also invite your divorced partner to the meetings or call them to talk to them about the child’s difficulties. Generally, it is best if both parents cooperate with regard to the child’s education and when it comes to dealing with their behavioral problems.
Parental Responsibility in the Pre-divorce Phase
Divorce or should the children stay together?
The period of doubt
The time before the final divorce decision is called by experts the ambivalent phase. This is to express that the data subject between the certainty of doing the right thing with the divorce and the doubts about the correctness of the divorce decision. In a moment, an image of a new beginning and a way of life without the partner with whom all things have become so difficult and unsatisfactory is clearly in one’s mind. The next moment, this picture breaks down and the fears of the uncertain future and the hope that the marriage can still be saved come to the fore.
Out of all the considerations about their own personal partnership, the care of the children is the most important.
- What does a divorce mean for them?
- Will they get over their parents’ separation or will they suffer for a long time, perhaps even in their personal life?
- Or, is a separation the better solution in the long run?
- Is it better for the children to grow up with conflicting and disgruntled parents, but still in a complete family
or is it better for them if their parents go through a divorce, but they grow up without there being disputes
between the parents?
Most parents clearly feel that they must act according to their desire to live a happier life, but their children’s wishes come first. You know that a wife is still the beloved mother of her child even if the personal expectations of a lifelong partnership are no longer met and that a man who is disappointed as a husband in the couple's relationship is still the beloved father of his child, regardless of this.
Arguing about things
There are disputes in every family as arguing is a way of finding solutions. There are situations that are unsatisfactory for one or more family members and that can be improved by conflict. There are conflicts that are solved by bringing conflicts and that prolong the family’s life. A feature of the "healthy" arguing is that the partners finally reach an agreement.
One has agreed on who can see what on television, when the car is available or when the three-year-old daughter should be home and then the battle is done. It is abundantly clear that the solutions are not valid for always. If something changes, for example, a new job is associated with longer travel times or the now fourteen-year-old daughter requires more space, the issues are re-opened.
It is different if the cause of dispute is that the adults are dissatisfied and unhappy with their marital relationship and every event is perceived to be governed by this air of dissatisfaction. Then there is only a semblance of peace and the family atmosphere cannot really be cleaned.
If you feel that the disputes on several occasions pile up and the real causes of the dispute lie in the dissatisfaction with your marriage, try to formulate the cause as clearly as possible and to talk with your partner about it. This leads to an unpredictable result. It can lead to real conflicts that are difficult, painful and exhausting are at first, but which ultimately lead to settlements and solutions, namely, both change. The disputes can lead to new dead ends of fruitless arguing. If you fear this or have already had the experience, visiting a counseling center may be helpful. Couples can be helped to understand each other’s points of view better there and talk in a more fertile way.
The period of doubt can be useful
This much is certain. A couple with a child or children going through a divorce is always an extension of the partner’s crisis of parenthood. Divorce is good. The children are certainly not meant to be affected, but they are. In most cases, the children do not want their parents to get a divorce, but they have to cope with it. In any event, the separation of parents throws children in a major crisis. The parents are guilty for a divorce, not their children. The decision to get a divorce may not be made hastily by any means and the assessment of the consequences of a divorce should be as realistic as possible.
Deal with your partnership issues
If you dare to approach the discussion on your partnership issues, please answer the question: Can the problems be solved in the marriage or is the separation really the only way?
The days when marriage counseling centers were the primary aim are long gone. The days when saving the marriage at any cost was aimed are long gone. Today, there are advisory bodies such as "family counseling centers or counseling for couples and families in conflict situations". At the end of such advice sessions, all possible paths to get out of a crisis that may well set back the separation decision should have been explored.
Divorce counseling can even go on for some years. Also, their tasks include seeking advice in the ambivalence phase and help to clarify the prospects for the survival of the marriage through counseling or therapy.
Get information and advice about divorce and its consequences
Divorce is much more than a legal process. The reorganization of life begins long before the divorce is filed and extends well into the time after the judge's decision. Each section of the divorce action brings new questions and demands. The more you know about it, the better you can prepare yourself for it.
You can get information on rights and duties, custody of the children, the cost of a divorce, the financial consequences (e.g. maintenance, old age) in family counseling or with the social services in your city or town and the youth office. There, you can also find out what help and support options you have and what options are there for your partner and your children. In addition, there is a variety of facilities, from the church to the folk high school, group meetings for divorce or already divorced parents. Finally, there are a number of advisers with different emphasis in the book trade and in the lending libraries.
Knowledge provides security
- It is easier to develop more precise ideas about the appropriate solutions for your situation and your child
if you are informed.
- When dealing with professionals with whom you will have to do in the course of the divorce proceedings
(attorney, employees of the agency, judges), you may experience issues that affect you, but which make
you more confident and more precise.
- For example, you can also better assess whether the attorney appointed by you can soften or worsen the
conflicts and, thus, if he is ultimately committed to your interests.
- Last but not least, it is easier to distinguish good advice from friends and relatives from ill advice.
Basically, it is useful if both parents attend an information evening or a counselor. Talking together is difficult enough during this period. It is somewhat easier if both parents have a comparable level of information. You might also point to your partner to brochures, books or websites that you think are informative.
A good level of information will help you to stay in control of the decisions that affect your life and your child. Teach them about the acquisition of information beyond the individual consultation. You can go to people specialized in family counseling or divorce counseling and you can get a consultation based on your personal problems and the situation in your family.
Check your expectations
Try to verify all critical expectations that you connect to a divorce before making a decision. The hope that everything will be better after the divorce, for example, is an expectation that will be most likely lead to disappointment. The evaluations of the experiences of other divorced people lead to the conclusion that things are likely to become much better only about two years after the divorce.
Other unrealistic expectations would be "I will never go back with them", "The divorce will solve all conflicts", " Everything will be easier after the divorce", "My life circumstances stay as they are, the only difference being that they are no longer in my life", "My child is so young that they will have forgotten their father (or mother) soon", "If I marry again, the children get a new mother (a new father) and my former wife (my ex-husband) is definitely unnecessary". These and other false expectations can lead to disappointment in the marriage, which very soon turns into the disappointment of divorce.
Try to be clear about what a divorce means for your child
It is not that long ago that children of divorced parents were necessarily expected to have permanent developmental and behavioral problems. Any problem, be it at school or at home, with peers or with adults, was seen as a result of the divorce. We now know that a complete family is not automatically an intact family and that a divorced family is not always a healthy environment for children to grow up in. Likewise, we know that many children of divorced parents grow into young adults and do not differ from their peers from non-divorced families.
And yet, the impact that a parental separation can have on children's development should not be underestimated. Since the situation is different in each family, one must look closer and ask the following question: What do children lose through separation or can they win by a parental separation, too? It is also clear that there is a difference between the separation experience and the long-term situation which results from a divorce.
The studies on children exposed to living in complete families, but in which there were severe marital conflicts have revealed that these children show precisely the behavior problems that have often been described as typical reactions of children to a divorce. The children from divorced families who were repeatedly investigated for many years were surveyed after a difficult adjustment period of about two years. As a result, the differences between them and children in complete families are small. Also, they did better than the children who grew up in conflict-loaded families. However, the children whose parents failed to end their conflicts in a reasonable period of time after the divorce were in a worse situation than the children whose parents have led a troubled marriage, but who did not get divorced.
Can one imagine how a child experiences this situation? It all begins with the word “choice”. If you think about your divorce and your, you should think instead of their parents’ divorce or separation. Not only are the parents separated, but the child will also experience very specific separations from their parents.
What can you do for your child at the time of a possible separation or divorce?
Children need clear messages
Long before a separation, a child has the unsettling feeling that something is wrong. They see if their parents do not want to talk about the fights with them or if their mother's tearful eyes remain unnoticed and the child is doing well if they notice anything at first. They fluctuate between the hope that everything will be all right and the fear that something threatening will happen, things which still have no name for the younger children.
The child is in a strained situation and they are looking for clues and answers to their questions. If no one is there or children do not dare to speak to someone who gives honest answers, so to speak, they talk to themselves. They begin to dream of what the cause could be, who is to blame and what is probable to happen the next. In a tense family atmosphere, children need clear messages, as described below.
The disputes are a matter exclusively for adults
The problems are between the parents, not between parents and children. However, the children should not be marginalized because, after all, they are also affected. They are their parents and it is their family. They are entitled to honest information and conversations. Tell them that the father and mother are currently fighting a lot because they have problems with each other, which only adults may have. The fact that it is currently very difficult to be with each other and that the adults have disputes can be much more difficult to assess by the children if you quarrel.
Also tell your children that what is happening in your family now is sad and it is not so beautiful and peaceful, but that there is no use in simply pretending that everything will be fine. Also, tell them that you do not blame them, although they are often scolded. Tell them that you will try to find solutions, even if you do not yet know what those solutions are.
Children should not feel responsible for the divorce
This applies to the dispute and causes for the termination of the dispute. In particular, younger children relate much of what is happening around them and even make mistakes when it comes to the person responsible. In other words, they see connections that are not actually there.
"Mom is so sad because I have not cleaned my room again!"
"Daddy is so angry because I was so wild when riding a bicycle and I scratched the car door!"
Such reasoning seduces children to believe they could do something to get everything back to the good old times, a hope that is doomed to failure and the children can be discouraged and end up desperate.
Children must not be turned into allies
Looking for support and reinforcement is probably a natural need in case of conflict, when the weakness and fragility of their senses are very pronounced, so the little ones prefer to be allies with one party. However, you should prevent the children from the playing this game! Given the fact that children need love and recognition from both parents, they run into conflicts of loyalty and lasting feelings of guilt when parents try to hold them by their side. The personality development can be heavily burdened.
Children need the emotional closeness of their parents
If the conflict-ridden family atmosphere increases the emotional alienation of the partners, make sure that the children still benefit from the emotional closeness. Try to be close to your children and spend enough time together with them, despite all the worries. Even if you are sad and you have just had a dispute, you should not leave them in front of the television alone. The fact is that much can be compensated by spending time with the children, who notice the difficult times in the family. The most important message for children is that their mother and father love them and are there for them, despite all their problems and you should then look convincing.
The period of doubt
The time before the final divorce decision is called by experts the ambivalent phase. This is to express that the data subject between the certainty of doing the right thing with the divorce and the doubts about the correctness of the divorce decision. In a moment, an image of a new beginning and a way of life without the partner with whom all things have become so difficult and unsatisfactory is clearly in one’s mind. The next moment, this picture breaks down and the fears of the uncertain future and the hope that the marriage can still be saved come to the fore.
Out of all the considerations about their own personal partnership, the care of the children is the most important.
- What does a divorce mean for them?
- Will they get over their parents’ separation or will they suffer for a long time, perhaps even in their personal life?
- Or, is a separation the better solution in the long run?
- Is it better for the children to grow up with conflicting and disgruntled parents, but still in a complete family
or is it better for them if their parents go through a divorce, but they grow up without there being disputes
between the parents?
Most parents clearly feel that they must act according to their desire to live a happier life, but their children’s wishes come first. You know that a wife is still the beloved mother of her child even if the personal expectations of a lifelong partnership are no longer met and that a man who is disappointed as a husband in the couple's relationship is still the beloved father of his child, regardless of this.
Arguing about things
There are disputes in every family as arguing is a way of finding solutions. There are situations that are unsatisfactory for one or more family members and that can be improved by conflict. There are conflicts that are solved by bringing conflicts and that prolong the family’s life. A feature of the "healthy" arguing is that the partners finally reach an agreement.
One has agreed on who can see what on television, when the car is available or when the three-year-old daughter should be home and then the battle is done. It is abundantly clear that the solutions are not valid for always. If something changes, for example, a new job is associated with longer travel times or the now fourteen-year-old daughter requires more space, the issues are re-opened.
It is different if the cause of dispute is that the adults are dissatisfied and unhappy with their marital relationship and every event is perceived to be governed by this air of dissatisfaction. Then there is only a semblance of peace and the family atmosphere cannot really be cleaned.
If you feel that the disputes on several occasions pile up and the real causes of the dispute lie in the dissatisfaction with your marriage, try to formulate the cause as clearly as possible and to talk with your partner about it. This leads to an unpredictable result. It can lead to real conflicts that are difficult, painful and exhausting are at first, but which ultimately lead to settlements and solutions, namely, both change. The disputes can lead to new dead ends of fruitless arguing. If you fear this or have already had the experience, visiting a counseling center may be helpful. Couples can be helped to understand each other’s points of view better there and talk in a more fertile way.
The period of doubt can be useful
This much is certain. A couple with a child or children going through a divorce is always an extension of the partner’s crisis of parenthood. Divorce is good. The children are certainly not meant to be affected, but they are. In most cases, the children do not want their parents to get a divorce, but they have to cope with it. In any event, the separation of parents throws children in a major crisis. The parents are guilty for a divorce, not their children. The decision to get a divorce may not be made hastily by any means and the assessment of the consequences of a divorce should be as realistic as possible.
Deal with your partnership issues
If you dare to approach the discussion on your partnership issues, please answer the question: Can the problems be solved in the marriage or is the separation really the only way?
The days when marriage counseling centers were the primary aim are long gone. The days when saving the marriage at any cost was aimed are long gone. Today, there are advisory bodies such as "family counseling centers or counseling for couples and families in conflict situations". At the end of such advice sessions, all possible paths to get out of a crisis that may well set back the separation decision should have been explored.
Divorce counseling can even go on for some years. Also, their tasks include seeking advice in the ambivalence phase and help to clarify the prospects for the survival of the marriage through counseling or therapy.
Get information and advice about divorce and its consequences
Divorce is much more than a legal process. The reorganization of life begins long before the divorce is filed and extends well into the time after the judge's decision. Each section of the divorce action brings new questions and demands. The more you know about it, the better you can prepare yourself for it.
You can get information on rights and duties, custody of the children, the cost of a divorce, the financial consequences (e.g. maintenance, old age) in family counseling or with the social services in your city or town and the youth office. There, you can also find out what help and support options you have and what options are there for your partner and your children. In addition, there is a variety of facilities, from the church to the folk high school, group meetings for divorce or already divorced parents. Finally, there are a number of advisers with different emphasis in the book trade and in the lending libraries.
Knowledge provides security
- It is easier to develop more precise ideas about the appropriate solutions for your situation and your child
if you are informed.
- When dealing with professionals with whom you will have to do in the course of the divorce proceedings
(attorney, employees of the agency, judges), you may experience issues that affect you, but which make
you more confident and more precise.
- For example, you can also better assess whether the attorney appointed by you can soften or worsen the
conflicts and, thus, if he is ultimately committed to your interests.
- Last but not least, it is easier to distinguish good advice from friends and relatives from ill advice.
Basically, it is useful if both parents attend an information evening or a counselor. Talking together is difficult enough during this period. It is somewhat easier if both parents have a comparable level of information. You might also point to your partner to brochures, books or websites that you think are informative.
A good level of information will help you to stay in control of the decisions that affect your life and your child. Teach them about the acquisition of information beyond the individual consultation. You can go to people specialized in family counseling or divorce counseling and you can get a consultation based on your personal problems and the situation in your family.
Check your expectations
Try to verify all critical expectations that you connect to a divorce before making a decision. The hope that everything will be better after the divorce, for example, is an expectation that will be most likely lead to disappointment. The evaluations of the experiences of other divorced people lead to the conclusion that things are likely to become much better only about two years after the divorce.
Other unrealistic expectations would be "I will never go back with them", "The divorce will solve all conflicts", " Everything will be easier after the divorce", "My life circumstances stay as they are, the only difference being that they are no longer in my life", "My child is so young that they will have forgotten their father (or mother) soon", "If I marry again, the children get a new mother (a new father) and my former wife (my ex-husband) is definitely unnecessary". These and other false expectations can lead to disappointment in the marriage, which very soon turns into the disappointment of divorce.
Try to be clear about what a divorce means for your child
It is not that long ago that children of divorced parents were necessarily expected to have permanent developmental and behavioral problems. Any problem, be it at school or at home, with peers or with adults, was seen as a result of the divorce. We now know that a complete family is not automatically an intact family and that a divorced family is not always a healthy environment for children to grow up in. Likewise, we know that many children of divorced parents grow into young adults and do not differ from their peers from non-divorced families.
And yet, the impact that a parental separation can have on children's development should not be underestimated. Since the situation is different in each family, one must look closer and ask the following question: What do children lose through separation or can they win by a parental separation, too? It is also clear that there is a difference between the separation experience and the long-term situation which results from a divorce.
The studies on children exposed to living in complete families, but in which there were severe marital conflicts have revealed that these children show precisely the behavior problems that have often been described as typical reactions of children to a divorce. The children from divorced families who were repeatedly investigated for many years were surveyed after a difficult adjustment period of about two years. As a result, the differences between them and children in complete families are small. Also, they did better than the children who grew up in conflict-loaded families. However, the children whose parents failed to end their conflicts in a reasonable period of time after the divorce were in a worse situation than the children whose parents have led a troubled marriage, but who did not get divorced.
Can one imagine how a child experiences this situation? It all begins with the word “choice”. If you think about your divorce and your, you should think instead of their parents’ divorce or separation. Not only are the parents separated, but the child will also experience very specific separations from their parents.
What can you do for your child at the time of a possible separation or divorce?
Children need clear messages
Long before a separation, a child has the unsettling feeling that something is wrong. They see if their parents do not want to talk about the fights with them or if their mother's tearful eyes remain unnoticed and the child is doing well if they notice anything at first. They fluctuate between the hope that everything will be all right and the fear that something threatening will happen, things which still have no name for the younger children.
The child is in a strained situation and they are looking for clues and answers to their questions. If no one is there or children do not dare to speak to someone who gives honest answers, so to speak, they talk to themselves. They begin to dream of what the cause could be, who is to blame and what is probable to happen the next. In a tense family atmosphere, children need clear messages, as described below.
The disputes are a matter exclusively for adults
The problems are between the parents, not between parents and children. However, the children should not be marginalized because, after all, they are also affected. They are their parents and it is their family. They are entitled to honest information and conversations. Tell them that the father and mother are currently fighting a lot because they have problems with each other, which only adults may have. The fact that it is currently very difficult to be with each other and that the adults have disputes can be much more difficult to assess by the children if you quarrel.
Also tell your children that what is happening in your family now is sad and it is not so beautiful and peaceful, but that there is no use in simply pretending that everything will be fine. Also, tell them that you do not blame them, although they are often scolded. Tell them that you will try to find solutions, even if you do not yet know what those solutions are.
Children should not feel responsible for the divorce
This applies to the dispute and causes for the termination of the dispute. In particular, younger children relate much of what is happening around them and even make mistakes when it comes to the person responsible. In other words, they see connections that are not actually there.
"Mom is so sad because I have not cleaned my room again!"
"Daddy is so angry because I was so wild when riding a bicycle and I scratched the car door!"
Such reasoning seduces children to believe they could do something to get everything back to the good old times, a hope that is doomed to failure and the children can be discouraged and end up desperate.
Children must not be turned into allies
Looking for support and reinforcement is probably a natural need in case of conflict, when the weakness and fragility of their senses are very pronounced, so the little ones prefer to be allies with one party. However, you should prevent the children from the playing this game! Given the fact that children need love and recognition from both parents, they run into conflicts of loyalty and lasting feelings of guilt when parents try to hold them by their side. The personality development can be heavily burdened.
Children need the emotional closeness of their parents
If the conflict-ridden family atmosphere increases the emotional alienation of the partners, make sure that the children still benefit from the emotional closeness. Try to be close to your children and spend enough time together with them, despite all the worries. Even if you are sad and you have just had a dispute, you should not leave them in front of the television alone. The fact is that much can be compensated by spending time with the children, who notice the difficult times in the family. The most important message for children is that their mother and father love them and are there for them, despite all their problems and you should then look convincing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)